Craven John, Strous Julie
Australasian Veterinary Boards Council (AVBC), Level 11, 470 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000 Australia.
J Vet Med Educ. 2004 Summer;31(2):100-4. doi: 10.3138/jvme.31.2.100.
Veterinary schools in Australia and New Zealand are assessed for accreditation purposes every six years by the Veterinary Schools Accreditation Advisory Committee (VSAAC), which is a standing committee of the Australasian Veterinary Boards Council (AVBC).1 Prior to undertaking an assessment, VSAAC requests a Self Evaluation Report from the school and subsequently spends a week on site to collect additional information. The committee also takes into consideration other quality assurance procedures within the university and aims for a process that complements other evaluation activities. Internal evaluation procedures within VSAAC are designed to reflect the process and outcomes of each visit and lead to annual revisions of the publication Policies, Procedures and Guidelines publication. The committee has close links with the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS), and there is a routine exchange of observers on all visits in the United Kingdom and Australasia. In recent years VSAAC has become increasingly interested in looking at ways to place greater emphasis on the outcomes of veterinary education and, eventually, to reduce our reliance on input measures. There has been good progress in identifying desirable attributes for veterinary graduates, but further work is needed to establish the reliability of assessment procedures. The Australasian accreditation system is very supportive of recent moves to achieve greater compatibility of veterinary accreditation systems in different parts of the world because we believe it has the potential to assist globalization of animal disease control and veterinary education.
澳大利亚和新西兰的兽医学院每六年会接受一次兽医学校认证咨询委员会(VSAAC)的认证评估,该委员会是澳大拉西亚兽医委员会理事会(AVBC)的常务委员会。1 在进行评估之前,VSAAC会要求学校提交一份自我评估报告,随后会花一周时间实地考察以收集更多信息。该委员会还会考虑大学内部的其他质量保证程序,并力求该过程能补充其他评估活动。VSAAC内部的评估程序旨在反映每次考察的过程和结果,并促使其每年修订《政策、程序和指南》出版物。该委员会与皇家兽医学院(RCVS)联系密切,在英国和澳大拉西亚的所有考察中都会定期交换观察员。近年来,VSAAC越来越关注如何更加强调兽医教育的成果,并最终减少我们对投入指标的依赖。在确定兽医毕业生的理想特质方面已经取得了良好进展,但仍需进一步开展工作以确定评估程序的可靠性。澳大拉西亚的认证体系非常支持近期为使世界不同地区的兽医认证体系实现更大兼容性而做出的努力,因为我们认为这有可能促进动物疾病控制和兽医教育的全球化。