Suppr超能文献

终末期呼吸困难和呼吸窘迫。

Terminal dyspnea and respiratory distress.

作者信息

Campbell Margaret L

机构信息

Palliative Care Service, Nursing Administration, Detroit Receiving Hospital, 4201 St. Antoine Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Clin. 2004 Jul;20(3):403-17, viii-ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2004.03.015.

Abstract

Dyspnea is a subjective experience that can be reported by the patient. Respiratory distress is an observable corollary, and represents the physical or emotional suffering that results from the experience of dyspnea. Recognizing and understanding this subjective phenomenon poses a challenge to intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians when caring for the patient who is dying in the ICU. Dyspnea and cognitive impairment are highly prevalent in the terminally ill ICU patient. A Respiratory Distress Observation Model may provide a theoretical foundation for the assessment of this phenomenon that is grounded in emotional and autonomic domains of neurologic function. Treatment of dyspnea and respiratory distress relies on nonpharmacologic interventions and opioids and sedatives. As with pain, the treatment of dyspnea and respiratory distress relies on close evaluation of the patient and treatment to satisfactory effect. Empirical evidence suggests that quality care with control of distressing symptoms does not hasten death. Withholding opioids or sedatives in the face of unrelieved dyspnea or respiratory distress has no moral foundation.

摘要

呼吸困难是一种患者能够表述的主观体验。呼吸窘迫是可观察到的相应表现,代表了由呼吸困难体验所导致的身体或情感痛苦。对于在重症监护病房(ICU)中濒死的患者,识别和理解这种主观现象对ICU临床医生构成了挑战。呼吸困难和认知障碍在晚期ICU患者中非常普遍。一种呼吸窘迫观察模型可能为基于神经功能的情感和自主领域来评估这一现象提供理论基础。呼吸困难和呼吸窘迫的治疗依赖于非药物干预以及阿片类药物和镇静剂。与疼痛一样,呼吸困难和呼吸窘迫的治疗依赖于对患者的密切评估并进行治疗直至取得满意效果。经验证据表明,控制痛苦症状的优质护理不会加速死亡。面对未缓解的呼吸困难或呼吸窘迫而停用阿片类药物或镇静剂没有道德依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验