Rao L P, Das S R, Mathews A, Naik B R, Chacko E, Pandey M
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Jul;33(5):454-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.006.
Assessing the relationship of oral squamous carcinoma with the mandible prior to definitive therapy poses a perplexing problem for the head and neck oncologist. We carried out a prospective open study of 51 (21 female and 30 male; mean age of 53.4 years) patients undergoing mandibular resections for oral squamous cell carcinoma to examine the incidence of mandibular bone invasion and to assess the predictive capabilities of clinical and radiological examination in detecting bone involvement. A detailed clinical examination was followed by radiographic evaluation of mandible for bone invasion. After resection, the mandible was sectioned serially at every cm to find the pathological bone involvement. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of clinical and radiological findings were calculated. Specimens from 25 patients (49%) (4 segmental 21 hemi) demonstrated tumour invasion on histological examination. Clinical impression of mandibular invasion showed a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 65%, whereas radiological examination had a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 88%. When considered together, clinical and radiological examinations were able to detect all the cases of bone invasion, but specificity was only 58%. This study advocates careful correlation of clinical and radiological findings prior to definitive therapy, as clinical examination tends to over diagnose bone invasion in tumours adjacent to the mandible. The specificity of imaging was also found to be low pointing towards the need for more specific diagnostic tools in doubtful cases. Aggressive surgical therapy, namely segmental or hemi resection of mandible is warranted in case of tumours of the lower alveolus with definite bone invasion. In case of carcinomas of the buccal mucosa and tongue the mandibular resection can be limited to that required for clearance of margins provided the radiology is negative.
在进行确定性治疗之前评估口腔鳞状细胞癌与下颌骨的关系,这给头颈肿瘤学家带来了一个棘手的问题。我们对51例(21例女性和30例男性;平均年龄53.4岁)因口腔鳞状细胞癌接受下颌骨切除术的患者进行了一项前瞻性开放性研究,以检查下颌骨骨侵犯的发生率,并评估临床和放射学检查在检测骨受累方面的预测能力。在进行详细的临床检查后,对下颌骨进行放射学评估以确定是否存在骨侵犯。切除术后,将下颌骨每厘米连续切片以发现病理性骨受累情况。计算临床和放射学检查结果的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。25例患者(49%)(4例节段性切除和例半侧切除)的标本在组织学检查中显示有肿瘤侵犯。下颌骨侵犯的临床诊断敏感性为96%,特异性为65%,而放射学检查敏感性为92%,特异性为88%。综合考虑临床和放射学检查时,能够检测到所有骨侵犯病例,但特异性仅为58%。本研究提倡在确定性治疗前仔细对比临床和放射学检查结果,因为临床检查往往会过度诊断下颌骨附近肿瘤的骨侵犯。影像学检查的特异性也较低,这表明在可疑病例中需要更具特异性的诊断工具。对于明确有骨侵犯的下牙槽肿瘤,有必要采取积极的手术治疗,即下颌骨节段性或半侧切除。对于颊黏膜和舌癌,如果放射学检查为阴性,下颌骨切除可仅限于清除切缘所需的范围。