高特质焦虑个体的前扣带回激活与决策过程中错误加工的改变有关。
Anterior cingulate activation in high trait anxious subjects is related to altered error processing during decision making.
作者信息
Paulus Martin P, Feinstein Justin S, Simmons Alan, Stein Murray B
机构信息
Department of Psychiatry, University of California Sand Diego, La Jolla 92093-9116, USA.
出版信息
Biol Psychiatry. 2004 Jun 15;55(12):1179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.02.023.
BACKGROUND
Individuals with high trait anxiety (HTA) can be studied to examine the effect of elevated levels of anxiety on the processing of stimuli and the selection of actions. The anterior cingulate cortex has been implicated in the detection and processing of errors. This investigation examined the hypothesis that HTA subjects are more sensitive to errors than nonanxious comparison subjects during a simple decision-making task and show increased activation in the anterior cingulate, particularly at low error rates.
METHODS
Thirteen HTA subjects were compared with 13 normal trait anxiety (NTA: 40th-60th percentile) subjects during functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a two-choice prediction task at three different error rates.
RESULTS
Both HTA and NTA subjects performed similarly during a simple two-choice prediction task; however, during the low-error-rate condition, activation in the anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex was significantly higher in HTA subjects and was correlated with trait but not state anxiety.
CONCLUSIONS
These results support the idea that HTA subjects devote more processing resources to decision making than do NTA subjects during times in which there is little chance of incorrect responding (i.e., the low-error-rate condition). The extent to which this altered activation within the anterior cingulate contributes to anxiety-proneness remains to be determined.
背景
具有高特质焦虑(HTA)的个体可用于研究焦虑水平升高对刺激处理和行动选择的影响。前扣带回皮层与错误的检测和处理有关。本研究检验了以下假设:在简单决策任务中,HTA受试者比非焦虑对照受试者对错误更敏感,并且在前扣带回中显示出更强的激活,尤其是在低错误率时。
方法
在功能磁共振成像期间,将13名HTA受试者与13名正常特质焦虑(NTA:第40至60百分位数)受试者进行比较,他们在三种不同错误率下执行二选一预测任务。
结果
在简单的二选一预测任务中,HTA和NTA受试者的表现相似;然而,在低错误率条件下,HTA受试者前扣带回和内侧前额叶皮层的激活显著更高,并且与特质焦虑而非状态焦虑相关。
结论
这些结果支持以下观点:在错误反应可能性很小的时期(即低错误率条件下),HTA受试者比NTA受试者在决策上投入更多的处理资源。前扣带回内这种改变的激活在多大程度上导致易焦虑性仍有待确定。