Suppr超能文献

慢性病生物学风险因素中的性别差异:基于人群调查的估计

Sex differentials in biological risk factors for chronic disease: estimates from population-based surveys.

作者信息

Goldman Noreen, Weinstein Maxine, Cornman Jennifer, Singer Burton, Seeman Teresa, Goldman Noreen, Chang Ming-Cheng

机构信息

Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544-2091, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004 May;13(4):393-403. doi: 10.1089/154099904323087088.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In light of substantial sex differences in health outcomes, researchers need to focus on disentangling the underlying biological and social determinants. The objective of this study is to determine whether two populations that differ in many cultural and social dimensions--Taiwan and the United States--also vary with regard to sex differentials in biological markers of chronic disease.

METHODS

The analysis is based on three population-based surveys that include interviews, urine and blood specimens, and physical examinations: the Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study (SEBAS) in Taiwan, the Wisconsin Longitudinal Survey (WLS), and the MacArthur studies of successful aging. The outcomes comprise six indicators of cardiovascular risk (total/high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin, and waist/hip ratio) and four markers of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis functioning (epinephrine, norepinephrine, cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate [DHEA-S]).

RESULTS

U.S. males have significantly higher risk than females for all indicators of cardiovascular risk except glycosylated hemoglobin (p < 0.05). Sex differences are less consistent and smaller in Taiwan. Indicators of SNS and HPA axis functioning reveal a significant female disadvantage in both countries.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis identifies important sex differences between Taiwan and the United States in biomarkers of cardiovascular risk that are consistent with cause of death data and may emanate from cultural and social differences between the two societies. The similarity of sex differences in SNS and HPA axis functioning across studies may reflect either stable sex differences in biological aging of these axes or commonalities in the social construction of gender-based responses to life experiences.

摘要

背景

鉴于健康结果存在显著的性别差异,研究人员需要专注于厘清潜在的生物学和社会决定因素。本研究的目的是确定在许多文化和社会层面存在差异的两个人口群体——台湾和美国——在慢性病生物学标志物的性别差异方面是否也有所不同。

方法

分析基于三项基于人群的调查,包括访谈、尿液和血液样本以及体格检查:台湾的社会环境与衰老生物标志物研究(SEBAS)、威斯康星纵向调查(WLS)以及麦克阿瑟成功衰老研究。结果包括六项心血管风险指标(总胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白[HDL]胆固醇、HDL胆固醇、收缩压和舒张压、糖化血红蛋白以及腰臀比)和四项交感神经系统(SNS)及下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺(HPA)轴功能标志物(肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素、皮质醇和硫酸脱氢表雄酮[DHEA - S])。

结果

除糖化血红蛋白外,美国男性在所有心血管风险指标上的风险均显著高于女性(p < 0.05)。台湾的性别差异不太一致且较小。SNS和HPA轴功能指标显示,在这两个国家女性均处于显著劣势。

结论

分析确定了台湾和美国在心血管风险生物标志物方面存在重要的性别差异,这与死亡原因数据一致,可能源于两个社会之间的文化和社会差异。跨研究中SNS和HPA轴功能性别差异的相似性可能反映了这些轴生物学衰老过程中稳定的性别差异,或者是基于性别的生活经历应对方式社会建构中的共性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验