Chesser R Terry
Department of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Jul;32(1):11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.11.015.
Phylogenetic relationships among New World suboscine birds were studied using nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. New World suboscines were shown to constitute two distinct lineages, one apparently consisting of the single species Sapayoa aenigma, the other made up of the remaining 1000+ species of New World suboscines. With the exception of Sapayoa, monophyly of New World suboscines was strongly corroborated, and monophyly within New World suboscines of a tyrannoid clade and a furnarioid clade was likewise strongly supported. Relationships among families and subfamilies within these clades, however, differed in several respects from current classifications of suboscines. Noteworthy results included: (1) monophyly of the tyrant-flycatchers (traditional family Tyrannidae), but only if the tityrines (see below) are excluded; (2) monophyly of the pipromorphine flycatchers (Pipromorphinae of ) as one of two primary divisions of a monophyletic restricted Tyrannidae; (3) monophyly of the tityrines, consisting of the genus Tityra plus all sampled species of the Schiffornis group (), as sister group to the manakins (traditional family Pipridae); (4) paraphyly of the ovenbirds (traditional family Furnariidae), if woodcreepers (traditional family Dendrocolaptidae) are excluded; and (5) polyphyly of the antbirds (traditional family Formicariidae) and paraphyly of the ground antbirds (Formicariidae sensu stricto). Genus Melanopareia (the crescent-chests), although clearly furnarioid, was found to be distant from other furnarioids and of uncertain affinities within the Furnarii. Likewise, the species Oxyruncus cristatus (the Sharpbill), although clearly tyrannoid, was distantly related to other tyrannoids and of uncertain affinities within the Tyranni. Results of this study provide support for some of the more novel features of the suboscine phylogeny of, but also reveal key differences, especially regarding relationships among suboscine families and subfamilies. The results of this study have potentially important implications for the reconstruction of character evolution in the suboscines, especially because the behavioral evolution of many suboscine groups (e.g., Furnariidae) is of great interest.
利用核DNA和线粒体DNA序列研究了新大陆亚鸣禽之间的系统发育关系。结果表明,新大陆亚鸣禽构成两个不同的谱系,一个谱系显然仅由单一物种谜窜鸟(Sapayoa aenigma)组成,另一个谱系则由其余1000多种新大陆亚鸣禽组成。除了谜窜鸟之外,新大陆亚鸣禽的单系性得到了有力证实,并且新大陆亚鸣禽中霸鹟类分支和灶鸟科类分支的单系性同样得到了有力支持。然而,这些分支内的科和亚科之间的关系在几个方面与当前亚鸣禽的分类有所不同。值得注意的结果包括:(1)霸鹟(传统的霸鹟科)的单系性,但前提是要排除蒂泰霸鹟类(见下文);(2)作为单系性受限的霸鹟科两个主要分支之一的尖嘴蝇霸鹟类(Pipromorphinae)的单系性;(3)蒂泰霸鹟类的单系性,由蒂泰霸鹟属(Tityra)加上希福氏霸鹟类(Schiffornis group)的所有抽样物种组成,作为侏儒鸟(传统的侏儒鸟科)的姐妹群;(4)如果排除砍林鸟(传统的砍林鸟科),灶鸟(传统的灶鸟科)的并系性;以及(5)蚁鸟(传统的蚁鸟科)的多系性和地蚁鸟(狭义的蚁鸟科)的并系性。新月胸雀属(Melanopareia,即新月胸雀)虽然明显属于灶鸟科类,但被发现与其他灶鸟科类关系较远,在灶鸟科内的亲缘关系也不确定。同样,尖嘴鸟(Oxyruncus cristatus)虽然明显属于霸鹟类,但与其他霸鹟类关系较远,在霸鹟科内的亲缘关系也不确定。这项研究的结果为[具体研究对象]亚鸣禽系统发育的一些更新颖特征提供了支持,但也揭示了关键差异,特别是在亚鸣禽科和亚科之间的关系方面。这项研究的结果对重建亚鸣禽的性状进化可能具有重要意义,尤其是因为许多亚鸣禽群体(如灶鸟科)的行为进化备受关注。