Critchley Julia A, Unal Belgin
International Health Research Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2004 Apr;11(2):101-12. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000114971.39211.d7.
There is on-going debate about the wisdom of substituting smokeless tobacco products for cigarette smoking as a 'harm reduction' strategy. It is generally believed that health risks associated with smokeless tobacco use (ST) are lower than those with cigarette smoking. However, the population attributable risk of smoking is higher for cardiovascular diseases than for any cancers, and few studies or reviews have considered the cardiovascular outcomes of ST use. A systematic review was therefore carried out to highlight the gaps in the evidence base.
Electronic databases were searched, supplemented by screening reference lists, smoking-related websites, and contacting experts. Analytical observational studies of ST use (cohorts, case-control, cross-sectional studies) were included if they reported on cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes, or risk factors. Data extraction covered control of confounding, selection of cases and controls, sample size, clear definitions and measurements of the health outcome and ST use. One or two independent reviewers carried out selection, extraction and quality assessments.
A narrative review was carried out. Very few studies were identified; only three from Sweden consider CVD outcomes and these are discrepant. There may be a modest association between use of Swedish snuff (snus) and cardiovascular disease (e.g., relative risk=1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-1.6) in one prospective cohort study. Several other studies have considered associations between ST use and intermediate outcomes (CVD risk factors).
There may be an association between ST use and cardiovascular disease. However, further rigorous studies with adequate sample sizes are required.
关于用无烟烟草制品替代吸烟作为一种“降低危害”策略是否明智,目前仍存在争议。人们普遍认为,与使用无烟烟草(ST)相关的健康风险低于吸烟。然而,吸烟对心血管疾病的人群归因风险高于对任何癌症的风险,而且很少有研究或综述考虑过使用ST的心血管结局。因此,开展了一项系统综述以突出证据基础方面的差距。
检索了电子数据库,并辅以筛选参考文献列表、与吸烟相关的网站以及联系专家。如果关于使用ST(队列研究、病例对照研究、横断面研究)的分析性观察研究报告了心血管疾病(CVD)结局或风险因素,则纳入研究。数据提取涵盖混杂因素的控制、病例和对照的选择、样本量、健康结局和ST使用的明确定义及测量。由一两名独立评审员进行选择、提取和质量评估。
进行了一项叙述性综述。仅识别出极少的研究;只有三项来自瑞典的研究考虑了CVD结局,且结果存在差异。在一项前瞻性队列研究中,瑞典鼻烟(snus)的使用与心血管疾病之间可能存在适度关联(例如,相对风险=1.4,95%置信区间1.2 - 1.6)。其他几项研究考虑了使用ST与中间结局(CVD风险因素)之间的关联。
使用ST与心血管疾病之间可能存在关联。然而,需要进一步开展有足够样本量的严谨研究。