Bekes Carolyn E, Dellinger R Phillip, Brooks Daniel, Edmondson Robert, Olivia Christopher T, Parrillo Joseph E
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, NJ, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2004 May;32(5):1207-14. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000126152.33719.db.
As academic health centers face increasing financial pressures, they have adopted a more businesslike approach to planning, particularly for discrete "product" or clinical service lines. Since critical care typically has been viewed as a service provided by a hospital, and not a product line, business plans have not historically been developed to expand and promote critical care. The major focus when examining the finances of critical care has been cost reduction, not business development. We hypothesized that a critical care business plan can be developed and analyzed like other more typical product lines and that such a critical care product line can be profitable for an institution.
In-depth analysis of critical care including business planning for critical care services.
Regional academic health center in southern New Jersey.
None.
As part of an overall business planning process directed by the Board of Trustees, the critical care product line was identified by isolating revenue, expenses, and profitability associated with critical care patients.
We were able to identify the major sources ("value chain") of critical care patients: the emergency room, patients who are admitted for other problems but spend time in a critical care unit, and patients transferred to our intensive care units from other hospitals. The greatest opportunity to expand the product line comes from increasing the referrals from other hospitals. A methodology was developed to identify the revenue and expenses associated with critical care, based on the analysis of past experience. With this model, we were able to demonstrate a positive contribution margin of dollar 7 million per year related to patients transferred to the institution primarily for critical care services. This can be seen as the profit related to the product line segment of critical care. There was an additional positive contribution margin of dollar 5.8 million attributed to the critical care portion of the hospital stay of patients admitted primarily through other product lines or the emergency room. This can be seen as the profit related to the "hospital service" segment of critical care. This represented a total contribution margin of dollar 12.8 million, approximately 24% of the institution's entire contribution margin. This information was subsequently used to develop strategic plans to promote this product line.
We were able to define the critical care product line, and we were able to demonstrate profitability through an analysis of revenue and expenses related to critical care services. Our experience suggests that the concept of critical care as a product line, in addition to a hospital service, may lead to a useful analysis of this new discipline. This plan provided a rational foundation for development of the operating and capital budgets for the health system.
随着学术医疗中心面临日益增加的财务压力,它们在规划方面采取了更具商业性的方法,尤其是针对离散的“产品”或临床服务线。由于重症监护通常被视为医院提供的一项服务,而非产品线,因此历史上并未制定商业计划来扩展和推广重症监护服务。在审视重症监护财务状况时,主要关注点一直是成本削减,而非业务发展。我们推测,可以像制定和分析其他更典型的产品线那样来制定和分析重症监护商业计划,并且这样的重症监护产品线对机构而言可以实现盈利。
对重症监护进行深入分析,包括重症监护服务的商业规划。
新泽西州南部的地区学术医疗中心。
无。
作为由董事会主导的整体商业规划流程的一部分,通过分离与重症监护患者相关的收入、支出和盈利能力来确定重症监护产品线。
我们能够确定重症监护患者的主要来源(“价值链”):急诊室、因其他问题入院但在重症监护病房停留过的患者,以及从其他医院转至我们重症监护病房的患者。扩展产品线的最大机会来自增加其他医院的转诊。基于对过去经验的分析,开发了一种方法来确定与重症监护相关的收入和支出。借助该模型,我们能够证明,对于主要因重症监护服务转至该机构的患者,每年有700万美元的正贡献毛利。这可视作与重症监护产品线部分相关的利润。对于主要通过其他产品线或急诊室入院的患者,其住院期间的重症监护部分还有580万美元的额外正贡献毛利。这可视作与重症监护“医院服务”部分相关的利润。这代表了总计1280万美元的贡献毛利,约占该机构总贡献毛利的24%。此信息随后被用于制定推广该产品线的战略计划。
我们能够界定重症监护产品线,并且通过对与重症监护服务相关的收入和支出进行分析,证明了其盈利能力。我们的经验表明,将重症监护视为一条产品线(而非仅仅是医院服务)的概念,可能会对这一新学科进行有益的分析。该计划为卫生系统运营预算和资本预算的制定提供了合理依据。