Timp Sheila, Karssemeijer Nico
Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Med Phys. 2004 May;31(5):958-71. doi: 10.1118/1.1688039.
Mass segmentation plays a crucial role in computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for classification of suspicious regions as normal, benign, or malignant. In this article we present a robust and automated segmentation technique--based on dynamic programming--to segment mass lesions from surrounding tissue. In addition, we propose an efficient algorithm to guarantee resulting contours to be closed. The segmentation method based on dynamic programming was quantitatively compared with two other automated segmentation methods (region growing and the discrete contour model) on a dataset of 1210 masses. For each mass an overlap criterion was calculated to determine the similarity with manual segmentation. The mean overlap percentage for dynamic programming was 0.69, for the other two methods 0.60 and 0.59, respectively. The difference in overlap percentage was statistically significant. To study the influence of the segmentation method on the performance of a CAD system two additional experiments were carried out. The first experiment studied the detection performance of the CAD system for the different segmentation methods. Free-response receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that the detection performance was nearly identical for the three segmentation methods. In the second experiment the ability of the classifier to discriminate between malignant and benign lesions was studied. For region based evaluation the area Az under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.74 for dynamic programming, 0.72 for the discrete contour model, and 0.67 for region growing. The difference in Az values obtained by the dynamic programming method and region growing was statistically significant. The differences between other methods were not significant.
在计算机辅助诊断(CAD)系统中,肿块分割对于将可疑区域分类为正常、良性或恶性起着至关重要的作用。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于动态规划的强大且自动化的分割技术,用于从周围组织中分割出肿块病变。此外,我们还提出了一种高效算法,以确保生成的轮廓是封闭的。在一个包含1210个肿块的数据集上,将基于动态规划的分割方法与其他两种自动分割方法(区域生长法和离散轮廓模型)进行了定量比较。对于每个肿块,计算了重叠标准以确定与手动分割的相似度。动态规划的平均重叠百分比为0.69,其他两种方法分别为0.60和0.59。重叠百分比的差异具有统计学意义。为了研究分割方法对CAD系统性能的影响,还进行了另外两个实验。第一个实验研究了CAD系统对不同分割方法的检测性能。自由响应接收器操作特性分析表明,三种分割方法的检测性能几乎相同。在第二个实验中,研究了分类器区分恶性和良性病变的能力。对于基于区域的评估,动态规划的接收器操作特性曲线下的面积Az为0.74,离散轮廓模型为0.72,区域生长法为0.67。动态规划方法和区域生长法获得的Az值差异具有统计学意义。其他方法之间的差异不显著。