Shen Hsain-Chung, Peng Hairong, Usas Arvydas, Gearhart Brian, Cummins James, Fu Freddie H, Huard Johnny
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2583, USA.
Bone. 2004 Jun;34(6):982-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.01.028.
Muscle-based gene therapy and tissue engineering hold great promise for improving bone healing. However, the relative advantage of muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs) or primary muscle-derived cells (MDCs) remains to be defined. We compared the ability of MDSCs and different subpopulations of MDCs (PP1 and PP3) to induce bone formation via ex vivo gene therapy. We were able to efficiently transduce the MDSCs and all the other evaluated populations of MDCs (efficiency of transduction = approximately 80%) by using a retroviral vector expressing human bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4). All the transduced cell populations secreted high levels of BMP4 (140-300 ng/10(6) cells/24 h), but the MDSCs differentiated toward the osteogenic lineage more effectively than did the other muscle cell populations, as indicated by the expression of alkaline phosphatase, an early osteogenic marker. von Kossa staining indicated that mineralized bone formed as early as 7 days after implantation of any of the BMP4-expressing cell populations into immunocompetent syngeneic mice; however, MDSCs expressing BMP4 produced significantly more bone than did the other MDC populations, as evidenced by both histomorphometry and biochemical analysis. Further investigation revealed that MDSCs expressing BMP4 persisted for a significantly longer period of time at the bone forming sites than did the other BMP4-expressing MDC populations. Additionally, MDSCs expressing BMP4 triggered a smaller infiltration of CD4 lymphocytes within the bone forming areas than did the other MDC populations expressing BMP4. Finally, we demonstrated that MDSCs expressing BMP4 can heal a critical-sized skull bone defect in immunocompetent mice. In summary, this study shows that MDSCs are better than primary MDCs for use as cellular vehicles in BMP4-based ex vivo gene therapy to improve bone healing. The advantage of MDSCs may be attributable, at least in part, to their lower immunogenicity and higher capacity for in vivo survival.
基于肌肉的基因治疗和组织工程在改善骨愈合方面具有巨大潜力。然而,肌肉来源的干细胞(MDSCs)或原代肌肉来源细胞(MDCs)的相对优势仍有待确定。我们比较了MDSCs和不同亚群的MDCs(PP1和PP3)通过体外基因治疗诱导骨形成的能力。通过使用表达人骨形态发生蛋白4(BMP4)的逆转录病毒载体,我们能够有效地转导MDSCs和所有其他评估的MDCs群体(转导效率约为80%)。所有转导的细胞群体都分泌高水平的BMP4(140 - 300 ng/10(6)细胞/24小时),但MDSCs比其他肌肉细胞群体更有效地向成骨谱系分化,这通过早期成骨标志物碱性磷酸酶的表达得以体现。冯·科萨染色表明,将任何表达BMP4的细胞群体植入具有免疫活性的同基因小鼠后,早在7天就形成了矿化骨;然而,表达BMP4的MDSCs比其他MDC群体产生的骨明显更多,组织形态计量学和生化分析均证明了这一点。进一步研究表明,表达BMP4的MDSCs在骨形成部位持续存在的时间明显长于其他表达BMP4的MDC群体。此外,表达BMP4的MDSCs在骨形成区域引发的CD4淋巴细胞浸润比其他表达BMP4的MDC群体小。最后,我们证明表达BMP4的MDSCs可以治愈具有免疫活性的小鼠的临界大小颅骨缺损。总之,本研究表明,在基于BMP4的体外基因治疗中,作为改善骨愈合的细胞载体,MDSCs比原代MDCs更具优势。MDSCs的优势可能至少部分归因于其较低的免疫原性和较高的体内存活能力。