Giannantoni A, Mearini E, Di Stasi S M, Costantini E, Zucchi A, Mearini L, Fornetti P, Del Zingaro M, Navarra P, Porena M
Department of Urology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2004 Mar;56(1):79-87.
Current pharmacologic treatment of detrusor overactivity relies on anticholinergic drugs. However, they often have untolerable side effects so that they are administered in doses insufficient to restore urinary continence. Recently, intravesical instillations and injections into the detrusor muscle of new pharmacological agents have been developed. The present study report our own experience in the treatment of detrusor overactivity with intravesical administrations of vanilloid agents and with botulinum-A toxin injections into the detrusor muscle in a group of spinal cord injured patients. In particular, we compared the clinical and urodynamic effects of the 2 drugs in an attempt to find a new and valid therapeutic option in those cases unresponsive to conventional treatment.
Seventy-five patients with spinal cord injury and refractory detrusor overactivity were included in the study: 35 patients received repeated intravesical instillations of resiniferatoxin (RTX) dissolved in normal saline; 40 patients received repeated injections of 300 units botulinum A-toxin diluted in 30 ml normal saline. Clinical assessment and urodynamics were performed at baseline and 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment.
With both treatments there was a significant reduction in mean catheterization and episodes of incontinence and a significant increase in mean first involuntary detrusor contraction and in mean maximum bladder capacity at 6, 12 and 24 months after therapy. We did not detect any local side effects with either treatment. Botulinum-A toxin significantly reduced also the maximum pressure of uninhibited detrusor contractions more than RTX at all follow-up time points.
In patients with spinal cord injury and refractory detrusor overactivity intravesical RTX and botulinum-A toxin injections into the detrusor muscle provided beneficial clinical and urodynamic results with reduction of detrusor overactivity and restoration of urinary continence in most patients. Botulinum-A toxin injection provided better clinical and urodynamic benefits than intravesical RTX.
目前对逼尿肌过度活动的药物治疗依赖于抗胆碱能药物。然而,它们常常有难以耐受的副作用,以至于给药剂量不足以恢复尿失禁。近来,已研发出向逼尿肌内膀胱灌注和注射新型药理制剂的方法。本研究报告了我们自身在一组脊髓损伤患者中采用香草酸类制剂膀胱内给药及向逼尿肌内注射肉毒杆菌A毒素治疗逼尿肌过度活动的经验。特别地,我们比较了这两种药物的临床和尿动力学效应,试图在那些对传统治疗无反应的病例中找到一种新的有效治疗选择。
75例脊髓损伤且伴有难治性逼尿肌过度活动的患者纳入本研究:35例患者接受溶解于生理盐水中的树脂毒素(RTX)反复膀胱灌注;40例患者接受稀释于30 ml生理盐水中的300单位肉毒杆菌A毒素反复注射。在基线以及治疗后6、12和24个月进行临床评估和尿动力学检查。
两种治疗方法均使平均导尿次数和尿失禁发作次数显著减少,且在治疗后6、12和24个月时平均首次非自主性逼尿肌收缩及平均最大膀胱容量显著增加。两种治疗方法均未检测到任何局部副作用。在所有随访时间点,肉毒杆菌A毒素比RTX更显著地降低了无抑制性逼尿肌收缩的最大压力。
对于脊髓损伤且伴有难治性逼尿肌过度活动的患者,膀胱内RTX灌注及向逼尿肌内注射肉毒杆菌A毒素均产生了有益的临床和尿动力学结果,多数患者逼尿肌过度活动减轻且恢复了尿失禁。肉毒杆菌A毒素注射比膀胱内RTX灌注带来了更好的临床和尿动力学益处。