Nakatsukasa M, Ogihara N, Hamada Y, Goto Y, Yamada M, Hirakawa T, Hirasaki E
Laboratory of Physical Anthropology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004 Jul;124(3):248-56. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.10352.
We investigated the energetic costs of quadrupedal and bipedal walking in two Japanese macaques. The subjects were engaged in traditional bipedal performance for years, and are extremely adept bipeds. The experiment was conducted in an airtight chamber with a gas analyzer. The subjects walked quadrupedally and bipedally at fixed velocities (<5 km/hr) on a treadmill in the chamber for 2.5-6 min. We estimated energy consumption from carbon dioxide (CO2) production. While walking bipedally, energetic expenditure increased by 30% relative to quadrupedalism in one subject, and by 20% in another younger subject. Energetic costs increased linearly with velocity in quadrupedalism and bipedalism, with bipedal/quadrupedal ratios remaining almost constant. Our experiments were relatively short in duration, and thus the observed locomotor costs may include presteady-state high values. However, there was no difference in experimental duration between bipedal and quadrupedal trials. Thus, the issue of steady state cannot cancel the difference in energetic costs. Furthermore, we observed that switching of locomotor mode (quadrupedalism to bipedalism) during a session resulted in a significant increase of CO2 production. Taylor and Rowntree ([1973] Science 179:186-187) noted that the energetic costs for bipedal and quadrupedal walking were the same in chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys. Although the reason for this inconsistency is not clear, species-specific differences should be considered regarding bipedal locomotor energetics among nonhuman primates. Extra costs for bipedalism may not be great in these macaques. Indeed, it is known that suspensory locomotion in Ateles consumes 1.3-1.4 times as much energy relative to quadrupedal progression. This excess ratio surpasses the bipedal/quadrupedal energetic ratios in these macaques.
我们研究了两只日本猕猴四足行走和双足行走的能量消耗情况。这些研究对象多年来一直进行传统的双足行走表演,是极为熟练的双足行走者。实验在一个配备气体分析仪的密闭舱内进行。研究对象在舱内的跑步机上以固定速度(<5公里/小时)分别进行四足行走和双足行走,每次行走2.5 - 6分钟。我们根据二氧化碳(CO₂)的产生量估算能量消耗。在双足行走时,其中一只研究对象的能量消耗相对于四足行走增加了30%,另一只较年轻的研究对象增加了20%。在四足行走和双足行走中,能量消耗均随速度呈线性增加,双足/四足的比例几乎保持恒定。我们的实验持续时间相对较短,因此观察到的运动成本可能包括稳态前的高值。然而,双足行走试验和四足行走试验的实验持续时间并无差异。所以,稳态问题并不能消除能量消耗的差异。此外,我们观察到在一次实验过程中运动模式从四足行走切换到双足行走会导致二氧化碳产生量显著增加。泰勒和罗恩特里([1973]《科学》179:186 - 187)指出,黑猩猩和卷尾猴双足行走和四足行走的能量消耗是相同的。尽管这种不一致的原因尚不清楚,但在非人类灵长类动物的双足运动能量学方面,应考虑物种特异性差异。在这些猕猴中,双足行走的额外成本可能并不高。实际上,众所周知,蛛猴的悬荡运动相对于四足行走消耗的能量多出1.3 - 1.4倍。这个超额比例超过了这些猕猴双足/四足的能量比例。