Sockol Michael D, Raichlen David A, Pontzer Herman
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 24;104(30):12265-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703267104. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
Bipedal walking is evident in the earliest hominins [Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de Leon MS, Lieberman DE, Guy F, Pilbeam D, et al. (2005) Nature 434:755-759], but why our unique two-legged gait evolved remains unknown. Here, we analyze walking energetics and biomechanics for adult chimpanzees and humans to investigate the long-standing hypothesis that bipedalism reduced the energy cost of walking compared with our ape-like ancestors [Rodman PS, McHenry HM (1980) Am J Phys Anthropol 52:103-106]. Consistent with previous work on juvenile chimpanzees [Taylor CR, Rowntree VJ (1973) Science 179:186-187], we find that bipedal and quadrupedal walking costs are not significantly different in our sample of adult chimpanzees. However, a more detailed analysis reveals significant differences in bipedal and quadrupedal cost in most individuals, which are masked when subjects are examined as a group. Furthermore, human walking is approximately 75% less costly than both quadrupedal and bipedal walking in chimpanzees. Variation in cost between bipedal and quadrupedal walking, as well as between chimpanzees and humans, is well explained by biomechanical differences in anatomy and gait, with the decreased cost of human walking attributable to our more extended hip and a longer hindlimb. Analyses of these features in early fossil hominins, coupled with analyses of bipedal walking in chimpanzees, indicate that bipedalism in early, ape-like hominins could indeed have been less costly than quadrupedal knucklewalking.
两足行走在最早的原始人类中就已很明显[佐利科夫CPE、庞塞·德莱昂MS、利伯曼DE、居伊F、皮尔比姆D等人(2005年)《自然》434:755 - 759],但我们独特的双腿步态为何进化至今仍不清楚。在这里,我们分析成年黑猩猩和人类的行走能量学和生物力学,以研究一个长期存在的假说,即与我们类猿祖先相比,两足行走降低了行走的能量消耗[罗德曼PS、麦克亨利HM(1980年)《美国体质人类学期刊》52:103 - 106]。与之前对幼年黑猩猩的研究结果一致[泰勒CR、罗恩特里VJ(1973年)《科学》179:186 - 187],我们发现在我们的成年黑猩猩样本中,两足行走和四足行走的能量消耗没有显著差异。然而,更详细的分析表明,大多数个体的两足行走和四足行走能量消耗存在显著差异,当将受试者作为一个群体进行检查时,这些差异被掩盖了。此外,人类行走的能量消耗比黑猩猩的四足行走和两足行走大约低75%。两足行走和四足行走之间以及黑猩猩和人类之间能量消耗的差异,可以通过解剖结构和步态的生物力学差异得到很好的解释,人类行走能量消耗降低归因于我们更伸展的髋部和更长的后肢。对早期化石原始人类这些特征的分析,再加上对黑猩猩两足行走的分析,表明早期类猿原始人类的两足行走确实可能比四足指关节行走消耗的能量更少。