Tiidema Anu, Truve Erkki
Institute of Experimental Biology, Estonian Agricultural University, Harku, Estonia.
Hereditas. 2004;140(3):171-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01757.x.
The regeneration potential of three major Estonian barley cultivars was tested and compared to that of the Finnish cultivar Kymppi. Two different regeneration systems were used. The first was characterized by the high maltose concentration (60 g l(-1)) and by the use of 2,4D together with two different combinations of amino acids in the callus induction medium followed by the regeneration medium containing BAP (2 mg l(-1)) and 2,4D (0.2 mg l(-1)). The second exploited callus induction medium that contained Dicamba, lower concentrations of maltose (30 g l(-1)) and higher concentrations of myo-inositol and thiamine and different set of amino acids and regeneration medium that contained higher concentrations of Cu2+ and inorganic nitrogen accompanied by lower concentrations of NH4+ and BAP, when compared to the first regeneration system. The second regeneration system used produced significantly higher rates of callus induction, callus growth and regeneration of plantlets. However, it yielded also many albino plants (up to 51%), whereas the first regeneration system used did not produce practically any albino plants. No major genotype-dependent differences were observed in comparison between two regeneration systems - in both systems higher regeneration potential of Anni, Elo and Kymppi contradicted to the low regeneration potential of Teele. It is concluded that the continuous somatic embryogenesis on the regeneration medium allows the regeneration of many plants from the same callus over long periods of time and makes available highly efficient regeneration protocols for Estonian and Finnish barley cultivars.
对爱沙尼亚三个主要大麦品种的再生潜力进行了测试,并与芬兰品种Kymppi的再生潜力进行了比较。使用了两种不同的再生系统。第一种系统的特点是麦芽糖浓度高(60 g l(-1)),在愈伤组织诱导培养基中使用2,4-D以及两种不同的氨基酸组合,随后在含有BAP(2 mg l(-1))和2,4-D(0.2 mg l(-1))的再生培养基中培养。第二种系统利用含有麦草畏、较低浓度麦芽糖(30 g l(-1))、较高浓度肌醇和硫胺素以及不同氨基酸组合的愈伤组织诱导培养基,以及与第一种再生系统相比含有较高浓度Cu2+和无机氮、较低浓度NH4+和BAP的再生培养基。使用的第二种再生系统产生的愈伤组织诱导率、愈伤组织生长率和植株再生率显著更高。然而,它也产生了许多白化苗(高达51%),而使用的第一种再生系统几乎没有产生白化苗。在比较两种再生系统时,未观察到主要的基因型依赖性差异——在两种系统中,Anni、Elo和Kymppi的再生潜力较高,与Teele的低再生潜力形成对比。得出的结论是,在再生培养基上持续的体细胞胚胎发生允许在很长一段时间内从同一愈伤组织再生出许多植株,并为爱沙尼亚和芬兰大麦品种提供了高效的再生方案。