de Moerloose P, Prins M H
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland.
Semin Vasc Med. 2001 Nov;1(2):175-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18485.
Due to increased awareness among physicians, the prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients clinically suspected of the disease has steadily decreased during the past 15 years. This has led to the development of simple diagnostic tools in an attempt to reduce the number of invasive or costly exams needed to manage these patients. D-dimer (DD) measurement has proven to be a simple and very useful test to exclude PE and several strategies combining DD with clinical probability and other exams have been validated in large outcome studies. The problem faced by many physicians is the choice of the specific DD test and its more appropriate position in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of PE. This article focuses on these questions and also provides some limitations of DD use, such as its poor specificity in hospitalized and elderly patients.
由于医生的认识提高,在过去15年中,临床疑似患有肺栓塞(PE)的患者中,肺栓塞的患病率稳步下降。这促使人们开发简单的诊断工具,以减少管理这些患者所需的侵入性或昂贵检查的数量。D-二聚体(DD)检测已被证明是一种简单且非常有用的排除PE的检测方法,并且在大型结局研究中,几种将DD与临床可能性及其他检查相结合的策略已得到验证。许多医生面临的问题是选择特定的DD检测方法及其在疑似PE患者诊断检查中更合适的位置。本文重点关注这些问题,并也指出了DD使用的一些局限性,例如其在住院患者和老年患者中特异性较差。