West Joyce C, Kosten Thomas R, Wilk Joshua, Svikis Dace, Triffleman Elise, Rae Donald S, Narrow William E, Duffy Farifteh F, Regier Darrel A
Psychiatric Research Network, American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education, 1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209, USA.
Am J Addict. 2004;13 Suppl 1:S8-16. doi: 10.1080/10550490490440753.
The aims of this study are to assess psychiatrists' comfort using office-based opiate agonist treatment (OBOT) and to identify psychiatrist characteristics associated with OBOT comfort. A random sample of 2,323 AMA Masterfile of Physicians psychiatrists were surveyed through the 2002 APIRE National Survey of Psychiatric Practice (NSSP). Of the 52% responding (N = 1,203), 80.6% (SE = 1.8%) were not comfortable providing OBOT. Males, addiction-certified psychiatrists, and those treating substance abuse patients were more comfortable providing OBOT. These findings highlight significant barriers in providing buprenorphine treatment. Increasing the understanding of specific financing and services delivery barriers that clinicians face is needed to inform the development of effective integrated services models and policies to facilitate OBOT implementation.
本研究的目的是评估精神科医生使用基于办公室的阿片类激动剂治疗(OBOT)的舒适度,并确定与OBOT舒适度相关的精神科医生特征。通过2002年美国精神病学实践全国调查(NSSP)对2323名AMA医师主文件中的精神科医生进行了随机抽样调查。在52%的回复者(N = 1203)中,80.6%(标准误 = 1.8%)对提供OBOT感到不自在。男性、获得成瘾认证的精神科医生以及治疗药物滥用患者的医生对提供OBOT更自在。这些发现突出了提供丁丙诺啡治疗的重大障碍。需要更多地了解临床医生面临的具体融资和服务提供障碍,以为制定有效的综合服务模式和政策提供依据,以促进OBOT的实施。