Gajewski James L, Foote Mary, Tietjen John, Melson Ben, Simmons Angela, Champlin Richard E
Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030-4009, USA.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004 Jul;10(7):427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.03.004.
The high cost per patient of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) causes this therapy to be the focus of much controversy, given the competing societal demands to provide all possible therapy to preserve life while simultaneously limiting global health care expenditures. Treatment and eligibility decisions for HCT often are heavily scrutinized by both governmental and private payers and not simply determined by physicians, facility providers, and the patient. In an effort to control costs, payers have administrative infrastructure to review resource utilization by these patients. Additionally payers have developed payment methodologies, usually in the form of a case rate payment structure, that place facilities and physician providers of HCT at financial risk for adverse patient financial outcomes in an effort to promote optimal utilization and selection of patients for HCT. As providers enter into such financial risk arrangements with payers, the providers need to understand the true cost of care and be able to identify predictable and unpredictable outlier risks for the financial consequences of medical complications. HCT providers try to protect themselves from excessive financial risk by having different payment rates for different types of transplant, eg, autologous versus HLA or genotypically matched related versus HLA mismatched transplants. Because at certain times in the HCT process risk is more unpredictable, HCT providers require different payment system strategies for the different time periods of care such as evaluation, pre-transplant disease management, harvesting, and cell processing, as well as short- and long-term follow-up. Involvement by clinicians is essential for this process to be done well, especially given the rapid changes technological innovation brings to HCT. Constant dialogue and interaction between providers and payers on these difficult financial issues with HCT is essential to preserve patient access to this potentially lifesaving therapy.
造血细胞移植(HCT)每位患者的高昂成本使得这种治疗方法成为众多争议的焦点,鉴于社会存在相互竞争的需求,既要提供所有可能的治疗以挽救生命,同时又要限制全球医疗保健支出。HCT的治疗和资格判定决策往往受到政府和私人支付方的严格审查,而不仅仅由医生、医疗机构提供者和患者决定。为了控制成本,支付方设有行政基础设施来审查这些患者的资源利用情况。此外,支付方还制定了支付方法,通常采用病例费率支付结构的形式,这使得HCT的医疗机构和医生提供者面临患者不良财务结果的财务风险,以促进对HCT患者的最佳利用和选择。当提供者与支付方达成此类财务风险安排时,提供者需要了解护理的确切成本,并能够识别医疗并发症财务后果的可预测和不可预测的异常风险。HCT提供者试图通过对不同类型的移植采用不同的支付费率来保护自己免受过度的财务风险,例如自体移植与人类白细胞抗原(HLA)或基因匹配相关移植与HLA不匹配移植。由于在HCT过程中的某些时候风险更不可预测,HCT提供者在护理的不同时间段,如评估、移植前疾病管理、采集和细胞处理以及短期和长期随访,需要不同的支付系统策略。临床医生的参与对于这个过程的顺利完成至关重要,特别是考虑到技术创新给HCT带来的快速变化。提供者和支付方就HCT这些棘手的财务问题持续进行对话和互动对于确保患者能够获得这种潜在的救命治疗至关重要。