Maartense S, Dunker M S, Slors J F M, Gouma D J, Bemelman W A
Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Colorectal Dis. 2004 Jul;6(4):254-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00588.x.
The aim of the study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) through a Pfannenstiel incision after prior laparoscopic colectomy.
Seventeen patients who underwent restorative proctectomy after laparoscopic emergency colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) were prospectively evaluated. Results were compared with results of a group of 21 case matched patients that had restorative proctectomy and IPAA via a midline incision in the same period.
Median operation time was longer, although not significantly, in patients who had a restorative proctectomy through a pfannenstiel (186 min) compared to a restorative proctectomy through a midline incision (158 min). Procedure related complications were comparable between the groups, respectively, 1 of 17 patients in the pfannenstiel group and 3 of 21 patients in the median laparotomy group. Median hospital stay in the pfannenstiel group was 10 days and in the midline group 12 days.
After laparoscopic assisted emergency colectomy for ulcerative colitis, restorative proctectomy is feasible and can be performed safely through a Pfannenstiel incision.
本研究旨在评估在先前腹腔镜结肠切除术后经耻骨上横切口行保留肛门的直肠切除术加回肠贮袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)的可行性和安全性。
对17例因溃疡性结肠炎(UC)行腹腔镜紧急结肠切除术后接受保留肛门的直肠切除术的患者进行前瞻性评估。将结果与同期21例经中线切口行保留肛门的直肠切除术和IPAA的匹配病例组的结果进行比较。
与经中线切口行保留肛门的直肠切除术(158分钟)相比,经耻骨上横切口行保留肛门的直肠切除术的患者中位手术时间较长,尽管差异不显著(186分钟)。两组的手术相关并发症相当,耻骨上横切口组17例患者中有1例,中线剖腹术组21例患者中有3例。耻骨上横切口组的中位住院时间为10天,中线组为12天。
在腹腔镜辅助下对溃疡性结肠炎行紧急结肠切除术后,保留肛门的直肠切除术是可行的,且可通过耻骨上横切口安全进行。