Julius Stevo, Kjeldsen Sverre E, Weber Michael, Brunner Hans R, Ekman Steffan, Hansson Lennart, Hua Tsushung, Laragh John, McInnes Gordon T, Mitchell Lada, Plat Francis, Schork Anthony, Smith Beverly, Zanchetti Alberto
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Lancet. 2004 Jun 19;363(9426):2022-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16451-9.
The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial was designed to test the hypothesis that for the same blood-pressure control, valsartan would reduce cardiac morbidity and mortality more than amlodipine in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk.
15?245 patients, aged 50 years or older with treated or untreated hypertension and high risk of cardiac events participated in a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of therapy based on valsartan or amlodipine. Duration of treatment was event-driven and the trial lasted until at least 1450 patients had reached a primary endpoint, defined as a composite of cardiac mortality and morbidity. Patients from 31 countries were followed up for a mean of 4.2 years.
Blood pressure was reduced by both treatments, but the effects of the amlodipine-based regimen were more pronounced, especially in the early period (blood pressure 4.0/2.1 mm Hg lower in amlodipine than valsartan group after 1 month; 1.5/1.3 mm Hg after 1 year; p<0.001 between groups). The primary composite endpoint occurred in 810 patients in the valsartan group (10.6%, 25.5 per 1000 patient-years) and 789 in the amlodipine group (10.4%, 24.7 per 1000 patient-years; hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.15, p=0.49).
The main outcome of cardiac disease did not differ between the treatment groups. Unequal reductions in blood pressure might account for differences between the groups in cause-specific outcomes. The findings emphasise the importance of prompt blood-pressure control in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk.
缬沙坦长期抗高血压使用评估(VALUE)试验旨在验证以下假设:对于心血管高危的高血压患者,在实现相同血压控制的情况下,缬沙坦比氨氯地平能更多地降低心脏发病率和死亡率。
15245名年龄在50岁及以上、患有已治疗或未治疗高血压且有心脏事件高风险的患者参与了一项基于缬沙坦或氨氯地平治疗的随机、双盲、平行组对照试验。治疗持续时间由事件驱动,试验持续至至少1450名患者达到主要终点,主要终点定义为心脏死亡率和发病率的综合指标。来自31个国家的患者平均随访4.2年。
两种治疗方法均能降低血压,但基于氨氯地平的治疗方案效果更显著,尤其是在早期(1个月后氨氯地平组血压比缬沙坦组低4.0/2.1 mmHg;1年后低1.5/1.3 mmHg;组间p<0.001)。缬沙坦组810名患者发生主要复合终点事件(10.6%,每1000患者年25.5例),氨氯地平组789名患者发生该事件(10.4%,每1000患者年24.7例;风险比1.04,95%CI 0.94 - 1.15,p = 0.49)。
治疗组之间心脏病的主要结局无差异。血压降低程度不等可能是组间特定病因结局存在差异的原因。这些发现强调了在心血管高危高血压患者中迅速控制血压的重要性。