Law Simon, Boey Jir-Ping, Kwok Ka-Fai, Wong Kam-Ho, Chu Kent-Man, Wong John
Division of Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Center, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Dis Esophagus. 2004;17(1):81-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00380.x.
Conventional pleural cavity drainage after esophagectomy involves one to two large-bore drainage tubes connected to underwater bottles. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a small mobile vacuum drainage system. Out of 173 patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy, 167 (97%) had the vacuum drain successfully placed at the end of the operation. Of those, use of the vacuum drain was uneventful for 131 until its removal (78%). Air leaks necessitating connection to underwater drainage occurred in 34 patients (20%), but in 26 of them this was only temporary. Overall success was therefore achieved in 157 patients (94%). Median in-situ placement of the vacuum drain was 4 days, and 85% of patients had their drains removed by the seventh postoperative day. The presence of lung adhesions significantly increased the need for underwater drainage. Postoperative outcomes were no different from a historical cohort with conventional underwater drainage. No drain-related complications were reported. The vacuum drain is an alternative to the conventional, large-bore, chest tube system after transthoracic esophagectomy.
食管癌切除术后传统的胸腔引流需要一到两根大口径引流管连接到水封瓶。本研究的目的是评估小型移动负压引流系统的应用。在173例行经胸食管癌切除术的患者中,167例(97%)在手术结束时成功放置了负压引流管。其中,131例(78%)在拔除负压引流管前使用过程顺利。34例(20%)患者出现漏气,需要连接水封引流,但其中26例只是暂时的。因此,157例(94%)患者总体获得成功。负压引流管的中位留置时间为4天,85%的患者在术后第7天拔除引流管。肺粘连的存在显著增加了水封引流的需求。术后结果与采用传统水封引流的历史队列无差异。未报告与引流管相关的并发症。负压引流是经胸食管癌切除术后传统大口径胸管系统的一种替代方法。