• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

杂交Ivor Lewis食管切除术后经胸引流:概念验证研究

Transhiatal Chest Drainage After Hybrid Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: Proof of Concept Study.

作者信息

Asti Emanuele, Sironi Andrea, Bonitta Gianluca, Bernardi Daniele, Bonavina Luigi

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan Medical School , Milano, Italy .

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Apr;28(4):429-433. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0580. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2017.0580
PMID:29237133
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intercostal pleural drainage is standard practice after transthoracic esophagectomy but has some drawbacks. We hypothesized that a transhiatal pleural drain introduced through the subxyphoid port site incision at laparoscopy can be as effective as the intercostal drainage and may enhance patient recovery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A proof of concept study was designed to assess a new method of pleural drainage in patients undergoing hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (laparoscopy and right thoracotomy). The main study aims were safety and efficacy of transhiatal pleural drainage with a 15 Fr Blake tube connected to a portable vacuum system. Pre- and postoperative data, mean duration, and total and daily output of drainage were recorded in an electronic database. Postoperative complications were scored according to the Dindo-Clavien classification.

RESULTS

Between June 2015 and December 2016, 50 of 63 consecutive patients met the criteria for inclusion in the study. No conversions from the portable vacuum system to underwater seal and suction occurred. There was no mortality. The overall morbidity rate was 40%. Two patients (4%) required reoperation for hemothorax and chylothorax, respectively. Percutaneous catheter drainage for residual pneumothorax was necessary in 2 patients (4%) on postoperative day 2. The mean duration of drainage was 7 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 2), and the total volume of drain output was 1580 mL (IQR = 880). No pleural effusion on chest X-ray was detected at the 3-month follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Transhiatal pleural drainage is safe and effective after hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and could replace the intercostal drain in selected patients.

摘要

背景

经胸段食管癌切除术后,肋间胸膜引流是标准操作,但存在一些缺点。我们推测,在腹腔镜手术时经剑突下切口置入的经裂孔胸膜引流管与肋间引流同样有效,且可能促进患者康复。

患者与方法

本概念验证性研究旨在评估在接受Ivor Lewis食管切除术(腹腔镜手术联合右开胸手术)的患者中采用一种新的胸膜引流方法的效果。主要研究目的是使用连接便携式负压系统的15F Blake引流管进行经裂孔胸膜引流的安全性和有效性。术前和术后数据、平均引流持续时间以及引流总量和每日引流量均记录于电子数据库中。术后并发症按照Dindo-Clavien分类法进行评分。

结果

2015年6月至2016年12月期间,63例连续患者中有50例符合纳入本研究的标准。未出现从便携式负压系统转换为水封瓶加吸引装置的情况。无死亡病例。总体发病率为40%。两名患者(4%)分别因血胸和气胸需要再次手术。术后第2天,2例患者(4%)因残留气胸需要进行经皮导管引流。平均引流持续时间为7天(四分位间距[IQR]=2),引流总量为1580mL(IQR=880)。在3个月的随访中,胸部X线检查未发现胸腔积液。

结论

Ivor Lewis食管切除术后,经裂孔胸膜引流安全有效,在部分患者中可替代肋间引流。

相似文献

1
Transhiatal Chest Drainage After Hybrid Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: Proof of Concept Study.杂交Ivor Lewis食管切除术后经胸引流:概念验证研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Apr;28(4):429-433. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0580. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
2
Outcomes of Transhiatal and Intercostal Pleural Drain After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: Comparative Analysis of Two Consecutive Patient Cohorts.艾弗·刘易斯食管癌切除术后经裂孔与肋间胸膜引流的结果:两个连续患者队列的比较分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 May;28(5):574-578. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0031. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
3
Incidence and management of chylothorax after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus.艾弗·刘易斯食管癌切除术后乳糜胸的发生率及处理
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 May;151(5):1398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.030. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
4
Pleural drainage after transthoracic esophagectomy: experience with a vacuum system.经胸段食管癌切除术后的胸腔引流:负压引流系统的应用经验
Dis Esophagus. 2004;17(1):81-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00380.x.
5
Transhiatal chest drainage in mediastinoscope and laparoscope-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective study.胸腔镜和腹腔镜辅助食管癌根治术中经食管床纵隔引流:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Aug 24;17(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01953-0.
6
Routine underwater seal drains are not required after transthoracic oesophagectomy: a pilot study.经胸段食管癌切除术后无需常规放置胸腔闭式引流管:一项初步研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Apr;35(4):694-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.11.018. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
7
Risk Factors For Chyle Leak After Esophagectomy.食管癌切除术后乳糜漏的危险因素
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2019 Oct-Dec;31(4):506-511.
8
Strategies to reduce pulmonary complications after transhiatal esophagectomy.经腹食管切除术术后减少肺部并发症的策略。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Nov 1;11(1):43-47. doi: 10.1093/dote/11.1.43.
9
[Pleural drainage].[胸腔引流]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Mar;134(11):536-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1208074. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
10
The Improved Mediastinal Drainage Strategy for the Enhanced Recovery System After Esophagectomy.改良的纵隔引流策略在食管癌术后加速康复系统中的应用。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Aug;112(2):473-480. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.188. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of utilizing mediastinal drains alone following esophageal cancer surgery: a retrospective study.食管癌手术后单纯使用纵隔引流的可行性:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 May 3;22(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03400-x.
2
Transhiatal chest drainage in mediastinoscope and laparoscope-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective study.胸腔镜和腹腔镜辅助食管癌根治术中经食管床纵隔引流:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Aug 24;17(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01953-0.
3
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in COVID hospitals and oncological hubs: are the outcomes different?
COVID医院和肿瘤中心针对癌症的微创食管切除术:结果有差异吗?
Eur Surg. 2022;54(2):98-103. doi: 10.1007/s10353-022-00751-1. Epub 2022 Mar 18.