Romano Patrick S, Mutter Ryan
Division of General Medicine and Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2004 Jun;4(2):131-57. doi: 10.1023/B:IHFE.0000032420.18496.a4.
The literature on hospital competition and quality is young; most empirical studies have focused on few conditions and outcomes. Measures of in-hospital mortality and complications are susceptible to bias from unmeasured severity and transfer/discharge practices. Only one research team has evaluated related process and outcome measures, and none has exploited chart-review or patient survey-based data. Prior studies have generated inconsistent findings, suggesting the need for additional research. We describe the strengths and limitations of various approaches to quality measurement, summarize how quality has been operationalized in studies of hospital competition, outline three mechanisms by which competition may affect hospital quality, and propose measures appropriate for testing each mechanism.
关于医院竞争与质量的文献尚不成熟;大多数实证研究仅聚焦于少数病症和结果。医院内死亡率和并发症的衡量指标容易受到未测量的病情严重程度以及转诊/出院方式的偏差影响。仅有一个研究团队评估了相关的过程和结果指标,且没有团队利用基于病历审查或患者调查的数据。先前的研究结果并不一致,这表明需要更多的研究。我们阐述了各种质量测量方法的优势和局限性,总结了在医院竞争研究中质量是如何被操作化的,概述了竞争可能影响医院质量的三种机制,并提出了适用于检验每种机制的措施。