DNA databanks: when has a good thing gone too far?
作者信息
Herlica Debra A
机构信息
Syracuse University College of Law, USA.
出版信息
Syracuse Law Rev. 2002;52(3):951-77.
PMID:15212076
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
DNA databanks: when has a good thing gone too far?DNA数据库：好事何时会过犹不及？
Syracuse Law Rev. 2002;52(3):951-77.
2
Willing to give up their DNA, but privacy too?愿意放弃自己的DNA，但也要放弃隐私吗？
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed). 2000 Apr 13;92(99):1, 9.
3
Mandatory genetic dogtags and the Fourth Amendment: the need for a new post-Skinner test.强制使用基因身份识别标签与第四修正案：后斯金纳时代新测试的必要性
Georgetown Law J. 1997 Jun;85(6):2007-38.
4
Canada's DNA databank: public safety and private costs.加拿大的DNA数据库：公共安全与个人代价。
Manit Law J. 2002;29(1):33-79.
5
I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.个人DNA信息采集、个人隐私与社会正义。
Chic Kent Law Rev. 1999;75:61-82.
6
Who needs special needs? On the constitutionality of collecting DNA and other biometric data from arrestees.谁需要特殊需求？论从被捕者那里收集DNA和其他生物特征数据的合宪性。
J Law Med Ethics. 2006 Summer;34(2):188-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00026.x.
7
DNA fingerprinting and civil liberties.DNA指纹识别与公民自由。
J Law Med Ethics. 2006 Summer;34(2):149-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00023.x.
8
Expanding databases, declining liberties.数据库不断扩张，自由却在减少。
Genewatch. 2006 Jan-Feb;19(1):3-8, 18.
9
Assessing Fourth Amendment challenges to DNA extraction statutes after Samson v. California.在桑普森诉加利福尼亚州案之后评估对DNA提取法规的第四修正案质疑。
Fordham Law Rev. 2008 Nov;77(2):917-49.
10
Beware! Uncle Sam has your DNA: legal fallout from its use and misuse in the U.S.
Ethics Inf Technol. 2004;6(1):55-63. doi: 10.1023/b:etin.0000036159.90081.cc.
Zotero 插件