Offenberg John H, Naumova Yelena Y, Turpin Barbara J, Eisenreich Steven J, Morandi Maria T, Stock Thomas, Colome Steven D, Winer Arthur M, Spektor Dalia M, Zhang Jim, Weisel Clifford P
Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA.
Environ Sci Technol. 2004 May 15;38(10):2760-8. doi: 10.1021/es035404g.
Indoor and outdoor concentrations of six chlordane components (trans-chlordane, cis-chlordane, trans-nonachlor, cis-nonachlor, oxychlordane, and MC5) were measured at 157 residences, all of which were inhabited by nonsmoking individuals, in three urban areas during June 1999-May 2000. The analyses were conducted on a subset of 48 h integrated samples collected in Los Angeles County, CA, Houston, TX, and Elizabeth, NJ within the Relationship of Indoor, Outdoor, and Personal Air (RIOPA) study. Both particle-bound (PM2.5; quartz fiber filter) and vapor-phase (PUF sorbant) chlordane concentrations were separately measured by GC/EI MS after solvent extraction. The outdoor (gas + particle) total chlordane (trans-chlordane + cis-chlordane + trans-nonachlor + cis-nonachlor) concentrations ranged from 0.036 to 4.27 ng m(-3) in Los Angeles County, from 0.008 to 11.00 ng m(-3) in Elizabeth, and from 0.062 to 1.77 ng m(-3) in Houston. The corresponding indoor total chlordane concentrations ranged from 0.037 to 112.0 ng m(-3) in Los Angeles County, from 0.260 to 31.80 ng m(-3) in Elizabeth, and from 0.410 to 38.90 ng m(-3) in Houston study homes. Geometric mean concentrations were higher in indoor air than outdoor air (1.98 vs 0.58 ng m(-3) in CA; 1.30 vs 0.17 ng m(-3) in NJ; 4.18 vs 0.28 ng m(-3) in TX), which suggests there are significant indoor sources of chlordane species in a subset of homes in each of the three cities. Calculated source strengths relate to home age, with the highest apparent indoor source strengths occurring in unattached single-family homes built during the period from 1945 to 1959. Principle indoor sources of chlordanes likely include volatilization from residues of indoor application of chlordanes and infiltration from subsurface and foundation application of chlordane-containing termiticides during home construction.
1999年6月至2000年5月期间,在三个城市地区的157户住宅中测量了六种氯丹成分(反式氯丹、顺式氯丹、反式九氯、顺式九氯、氧氯丹和MC5)的室内和室外浓度,所有住户均为不吸烟者。这些分析是在室内、室外和个人空气关系(RIOPA)研究中,对加利福尼亚州洛杉矶县、得克萨斯州休斯顿市和新泽西州伊丽莎白市采集的48小时综合样本的一个子集进行的。溶剂萃取后,通过气相色谱/电子轰击质谱法分别测量了颗粒结合态(PM2.5;石英纤维滤膜)和气态(聚氨酯泡沫吸附剂)氯丹浓度。洛杉矶县室外(气态+颗粒态)总氯丹(反式氯丹+顺式氯丹+反式九氯+顺式九氯)浓度范围为0.036至4.27 ng m(-3),伊丽莎白市为0.008至11.00 ng m(-3),休斯顿为0.062至1.77 ng m(-3)。相应的室内总氯丹浓度在洛杉矶县住宅中为0.037至112.0 ng m(-3),伊丽莎白市为0.260至31.80 ng m(-3),休斯顿研究住宅中为0.410至38.90 ng m(-3)。室内空气中几何平均浓度高于室外空气(加利福尼亚州为1.98 vs 0.58 ng m(-3);新泽西州为1.30 vs 0.17 ng m(-3);得克萨斯州为4.18 vs 0.28 ng m(-)-3),这表明在这三个城市的部分住宅中,氯丹种类存在显著的室内来源。计算得出的源强与房屋年龄有关,1945年至1959年期间建造的独立单户住宅中,室内源强最高。氯丹的主要室内来源可能包括室内施用氯丹残留的挥发,以及房屋建造期间地下和基础施用含氯丹白蚁防治剂的渗透。