Porras Simo P, Kenndler Ernst
Institute for Analytical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Wahringerstrasse 38, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
J Chromatogr A. 2004 May 28;1037(1-2):455-65. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.07.018.
Although the establishment of a pH scale and the determination of the pH in water is not problematic, it is not a straightforward task in non-aqueous solvents. As capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) in organic solvents has gained increasing interest, it seems to be valuable to re-discuss the concept of the pH in such media, especially pointing to those aspects, which make pH measurement uncertain in non-aqueous solvents. In this review, the relevant aspects when dealing with primary standard (PS) and secondary standard (SS) as recommended by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), and the usage of the operational pH are discussed with special emphasis to non-aqueous solvents. Here, different liquid junction potentials, incomplete dissociation of the electrolytes (especially in solvents with low or moderate relative permittivity) and the occurrence of homo- and heteroconjugation must be taken into account. Problems arising in capillary zone electrophoresis practice are addressed, e.g. when the background electrolyte (BGE) consists of organic solvents, but the measuring electrode (normally the glass electrode) is calibrated with aqueous buffers, and the liquid junction potentials between the solvents do not cancel each other. The alternative concept of establishing a certain pH is described, using mixtures of reference acids or bases with known pKa in the organic solvent, and their respective salts, at a certain concentration ratio, relying to the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. Special discussion is directed to those organic solvents most common in capillary zone electrophoresis, methanol (MeOH) and acetonitrile (ACN), but other solvents are included as well. The potential significance of small amounts of water present in the organic solvent on changes in pKa values, and thus on the pH of the buffering components is pointed out.
虽然建立pH标度以及测定水中的pH值并无问题,但在非水溶剂中这并非一项简单的任务。随着有机溶剂中的毛细管区带电泳(CZE)越来越受到关注,重新讨论此类介质中pH的概念似乎很有价值,特别是指出那些使非水溶剂中pH测量不确定的方面。在这篇综述中,讨论了国际纯粹与应用化学联合会(IUPAC)推荐的处理一级标准(PS)和二级标准(SS)时的相关方面,以及操作pH的使用,特别强调了非水溶剂。这里,必须考虑不同的液接电位、电解质的不完全离解(特别是在相对介电常数低或中等的溶剂中)以及均共轭和异共轭的发生。还讨论了毛细管区带电泳实践中出现的问题,例如当背景电解质(BGE)由有机溶剂组成,但测量电极(通常是玻璃电极)用水性缓冲液校准,且溶剂之间的液接电位不能相互抵消时的情况。描述了使用有机溶剂中已知pKa的参考酸或碱及其各自盐的混合物,以一定浓度比,依据亨德森 - 哈塞尔巴尔赫方程建立特定pH的替代概念。特别讨论了毛细管区带电泳中最常见的有机溶剂甲醇(MeOH)和乙腈(ACN),但也包括了其他溶剂。指出了有机溶剂中存在的少量水对pKa值变化进而对缓冲成分pH的潜在影响。