Norrby S R, Quinn J, Rangaraju M, Leroy B
Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Solna, Sweden.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004 Jul;10(7):615-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00908.x.
A pooled analysis of two double-blind, multicentre, Phase III studies compared oral telithromycin 800 mg once-daily for 5 days with penicillin V 500 mg three-times-daily or clarithromycin 250 mg twice-daily for 10 days in the treatment of Streptococcus pyogenes (group A beta-haemolytic streptococcus; GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis. Patients aged > or = 13 years with acute GABHS tonsillopharyngitis were randomised to receive telithromycin (n = 430), penicillin (n = 197) or clarithromycin (n = 231). Clinical isolates of S. pyogenes (n = 590) obtained from throat swab samples on study entry were tested for their in-vitro susceptibility to telithromycin, clarithromycin and azithromycin. Telithromycin demonstrated in-vitro activity against the clinical isolates of S. pyogenes (MIC50/90 0.03/0.06 mg/L) higher than clarithromycin or azithromycin (MIC50/90 0.06/0.06 mg/L and 0.12/0.25 mg/L, respectively), including erythromycin-resistant strains. At the post-therapy/test of cure (TOC) visit (days 16-23), satisfactory bacteriological outcome was demonstrated for 88.3% (234/265) and 88.6% (225/254) of telithromycin- and comparator-treated patients, respectively (per-protocol population). Overall, GABHS eradication rates were 88.7% (235/265) for telithromycin and 89.0% (226/254) for comparators. The clinical cure rates at the post-therapy/TOC visit were 93.6% (248/265) and 90.9% (220/242) for telithromycin and pooled comparators, respectively. Telithromycin was generally well-tolerated. Most adverse events considered to be possibly related to study medication were gastrointestinal and of mild intensity. Discontinuations as a result of adverse events were few in both treatment groups. In conclusion, telithromycin 800 mg once-daily for 5 days was as effective as penicillin V or clarithromycin for 10 days in the treatment of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis.
一项对两项双盲、多中心、III期研究的汇总分析,比较了每日一次口服800mg泰利霉素共5天与每日三次口服500mg青霉素V或每日两次口服250mg克拉霉素共10天治疗化脓性链球菌(A组β溶血性链球菌;GABHS)扁桃体咽炎的效果。年龄≥13岁的急性GABHS扁桃体咽炎患者被随机分配接受泰利霉素(n = 430)、青霉素(n = 197)或克拉霉素(n = 231)治疗。在研究入组时从咽拭子样本中获得的590株化脓性链球菌临床分离株,检测其对泰利霉素、克拉霉素和阿奇霉素的体外敏感性。泰利霉素对化脓性链球菌临床分离株显示出的体外活性(MIC50/90为0.03/0.06mg/L)高于克拉霉素或阿奇霉素(MIC50/90分别为0.06/0.06mg/L和0.12/0.25mg/L),包括红霉素耐药菌株。在治疗后/治愈测试(TOC)访视(第16 - 23天)时,泰利霉素治疗组和对照治疗组分别有88.3%(234/265)和88.6%(225/254)的患者获得了满意的细菌学结果(符合方案人群)。总体而言,泰利霉素组的GABHS根除率为88.7%(235/265),对照组为89.0%(226/254)。治疗后/TOC访视时,泰利霉素组和合并对照组的临床治愈率分别为93.6%(248/265)和90.9%(220/242)。泰利霉素总体耐受性良好。大多数被认为可能与研究用药相关的不良事件为胃肠道事件,且强度较轻。两个治疗组因不良事件而停药的情况都很少。总之,每日一次口服800mg泰利霉素共5天在治疗GABHS扁桃体咽炎方面与每日三次口服青霉素V或每日两次口服克拉霉素共10天的效果相当。