Munteanu Mona, Messous Djamila, Thabut Dominique, Imbert-Bismut Françoise, Jouys Mathieu, Massard Julien, Piton Annie, Bonyhay Luminita, Ratziu Vlad, Hainque Bernard, Poynard Thierry
Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Hôpital La Pitie-Salpétrière, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France.
Comp Hepatol. 2004 Jun 23;3(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1476-5926-3-3.
Biochemical marker combinations, including alpha2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and total bilirubin (all part of FibroTest) plus alanine aminotransferase (all part of ActiTest), are being developed as alternatives to liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C and other various chronic liver diseases. Considering this premise, the primary aim of this study was to assess the impact of meal intake on FibroTest and ActiTest results. Such studies are very important for patients, as many clinical errors have been related to the absence of baseline evidence. RESULTS: Intra-individual variation was assessed for the 6 above components and for FibroTest and ActiTest, by measuring time dependent variations before and one hour after a standard meal in 64 subjects. These consisted of 29 healthy volunteers and 35 patients with chronic liver diseases. Meal intake had no significant impact on any of the six components, or on FibroTest or ActiTest, as assessed by repeated measure variance analyses (ANOVA all p > 0.90); the Spearman correlation coefficient ranged from 0.87 (total bilirubin) to 0.995 (gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase). The coefficients of variation (CV) between fasting and postprandial measurements fluctuated for the six components from 0.09 (apolipoprotein A1) to 0.14 (alpha2-macroglobulin), and from 0.09 for FibroTest to 0.13 for ActiTest. In contrast, meal intake had a significant impact on triglycerides (ANOVA p = 0.01, CV = 0.65) and glucose (ANOVA p = 0.04, CV = 0.31). As for the prediction of liver injury, the concordance between fasting and postprandial predicted histological stages and grades was almost perfect, both for FibroTest (kappa = 0.91, p < 0.001) and ActiTest (kappa = 0.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The intra-individual variation of biochemical markers was low, and it was shown that measurements of FibroTest, ActiTest and their components are not significantly modified by meal intake. This fact makes the screening of patients at risk of chronic liver diseases more convenient.
包括α2-巨球蛋白、触珠蛋白、载脂蛋白A1、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶和总胆红素(均为FibroTest的组成部分)加丙氨酸转氨酶(均为ActiTest的组成部分)在内的生化标志物组合,正被开发作为慢性丙型肝炎和其他各种慢性肝病患者肝活检的替代方法。基于这一前提,本研究的主要目的是评估进餐对FibroTest和ActiTest结果的影响。此类研究对患者非常重要,因为许多临床错误都与缺乏基线证据有关。结果:通过测量64名受试者在标准餐后一小时前后的时间依赖性变化,评估了上述6种成分以及FibroTest和ActiTest的个体内变异。这些受试者包括29名健康志愿者和35名慢性肝病患者。通过重复测量方差分析(所有方差分析p>0.90)评估,进餐对六种成分中的任何一种、FibroTest或ActiTest均无显著影响;Spearman相关系数范围从0.87(总胆红素)到0.995(γ-谷氨酰转肽酶)。六种成分在空腹和餐后测量之间的变异系数(CV)从0.09(载脂蛋白A1)到0.14(α2-巨球蛋白)波动,FibroTest的变异系数为0.09,ActiTest的变异系数为0.13。相比之下,进餐对甘油三酯(方差分析p=0.01,CV=0.65)和葡萄糖(方差分析p=0.04,CV=0.31)有显著影响。至于肝损伤的预测,FibroTest(kappa=0.91,p<0.001)和ActiTest(kappa=0.80,p<0.001)在空腹和餐后预测的组织学分期和分级之间的一致性几乎完美。结论:生化标志物的个体内变异较低,结果表明进餐对FibroTest、ActiTest及其成分的测量没有显著影响。这一事实使得对慢性肝病风险患者的筛查更加方便。