Cruess Gord
Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2004 Apr;9(1):54-5.
In two recent decisions, R v Malmo-Levine and R v Caine (decided together) and R v Clay, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the criminal prohibition on marijuana possession, in the absence of a regulatory exemption for medical purposes, is constitutional.
在最近的两项裁决中,即R诉马尔莫 - 莱文案和R诉凯恩案(合并裁决)以及R诉克莱案中,加拿大最高法院裁定,在没有医疗用途监管豁免的情况下,对持有大麻的刑事禁令是符合宪法的。