Kratz C D, Christ M, Maisch B, Kerwat K M, Olt C, Zielke A, Hellinger A, Wulf H, Geldner G
Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum der Philipps-Universität Marburg.
Anaesthesist. 2004 Sep;53(9):862-70. doi: 10.1007/s00101-004-0709-x.
The older the patient, the higher the risk of perioperative cardiac complications. Therefore, patients at risk have to be identified and the appropriate diagnostic or therapeutic measures initiated. The most important factor in this context is whether a planned surgery can be postponed. Several strategies have been developed (e.g. Goldman index, Eagle criteria) and the American Heart Association (AHA/ACC) has produced guidelines concerning perioperative diagnosis and therapy of cardiac risk patients. The common goal of these strategies is always the risk classification of the patient by combining the operative risk and the risk factors of the patient. The further procedure (diagnostic or therapeutic measures) is based on the risk classification. If further invasive therapy proves to be necessary, the determining factor is the period of time for which the operation can be delayed. This appears to be about 3 months but if this is not possible the outcome could be improved with a beta-blocker therapy in advance. A working group from the university hospital in Marburg has developed a strategy for risk classification and further diagnostic and therapeutic measures as outlined in this article.
患者年龄越大,围手术期心脏并发症的风险越高。因此,必须识别出有风险的患者,并启动适当的诊断或治疗措施。在此背景下,最重要的因素是计划中的手术是否可以推迟。已经制定了几种策略(如Goldman指数、Eagle标准),美国心脏协会(AHA/ACC)也制定了关于心脏风险患者围手术期诊断和治疗的指南。这些策略的共同目标始终是通过结合手术风险和患者的风险因素对患者进行风险分类。进一步的程序(诊断或治疗措施)基于风险分类。如果证明有必要进行进一步的侵入性治疗,决定因素是手术可以推迟的时间。这似乎约为3个月,但如果无法做到这一点,提前进行β受体阻滞剂治疗可能会改善结果。马尔堡大学医院的一个工作组制定了一种风险分类策略以及本文所述的进一步诊断和治疗措施。