• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于预测冠状动脉血管成形术成功率和并发症的简化病变分类。心脏血管造影和介入学会注册委员会。

A simplified lesion classification for predicting success and complications of coronary angioplasty. Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Intervention.

作者信息

Krone R J, Laskey W K, Johnson C, Kimmel S E, Klein L W, Weiner B H, Cosentino J J, Johnson S A, Babb J D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63110-1093, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2000 May 15;85(10):1179-84. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00724-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00724-4
PMID:10801997
Abstract

In 1988, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures presented a classification of coronary lesions utilizing 26 lesion features to predict the success and complications of balloon angioplasty. Using data from the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) we evaluated the ability of this classification to predict success and complications. Lesion success, death in hospital, emergency cardiac bypass surgery, and major adverse events were evaluated in 41,071 patients who underwent single-vessel angioplasty from January 1993 to June 1996. Logistic models using the ACC/AHA lesion classification, vessel patency, or both, were compared. A new classification based on the interaction of the ACC/AHA classification plus lesion patency was compared with the existing ACC/AHA classification. Vessel patency, added to the ACC/AHA classification, improved prediction of lesion success (p </=0.0001). Class A and patent B lesions had similar success and complication rates, so a simplified classification (SCAI) using only 7 lesion characteristics could be created. This system (I: non-C patent, II: C patent, III: non-C occluded, and IV: C occluded) improved prediction of lesion success compared with the ACC/AHA classification (Bayesian Information Criterion statistic: ACC/AHA 16539, SCAI 15956; and area under the receiver- operating characteristics curve 0.659, 0.693, respectively). The SCAI classification was preferred for predicting major complications and in-hospital death and was similar to the ACC/AHA classification for predicting emergency bypass surgery.

摘要

1988年,美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)心血管诊断和治疗程序评估特别工作组提出了一种利用26个病变特征对冠状动脉病变进行分类的方法,以预测球囊血管成形术的成功率和并发症。我们使用心脏血管造影和介入学会(SCAI)注册中心的数据,评估了这种分类方法预测成功率和并发症的能力。对1993年1月至1996年6月期间接受单支血管成形术的41071例患者的病变成功率、住院死亡、急诊心脏搭桥手术和主要不良事件进行了评估。比较了使用ACC/AHA病变分类、血管通畅情况或两者的逻辑模型。将基于ACC/AHA分类与病变通畅情况相互作用的新分类与现有的ACC/AHA分类进行了比较。将血管通畅情况添加到ACC/AHA分类中,可改善对病变成功率的预测(p≤0.0001)。A类病变和通畅的B类病变具有相似的成功率和并发症发生率,因此可以创建一种仅使用7个病变特征的简化分类(SCAI)。与ACC/AHA分类相比,该系统(I:非C型通畅,II:C型通畅,III:非C型闭塞,IV:C型闭塞)改善了对病变成功率的预测(贝叶斯信息准则统计量:ACC/AHA为16539,SCAI为15956;受试者操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.659、0.693)。SCAI分类在预测主要并发症和住院死亡方面更具优势,在预测急诊搭桥手术方面与ACC/AHA分类相似。

相似文献

1
A simplified lesion classification for predicting success and complications of coronary angioplasty. Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Intervention.一种用于预测冠状动脉血管成形术成功率和并发症的简化病变分类。心脏血管造影和介入学会注册委员会。
Am J Cardiol. 2000 May 15;85(10):1179-84. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00724-4.
2
Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the Society for Coronary Angiography and Interventions lesion classification system in the current "stent era" of coronary interventions (from the ACC-National Cardiovascular Data Registry).
Am J Cardiol. 2003 Aug 15;92(4):389-94. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00655-6.
3
Comparison of Mayo Clinic risk score and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lesion classification in the prediction of adverse cardiovascular outcome following percutaneous coronary interventions.梅奥诊所风险评分与美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会病变分类在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后不良心血管结局预测中的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jul 21;44(2):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.059.
4
Evaluation of the Society for Coronary Angiography and Interventions' lesion classification system in 14,133 patients with percutaneous coronary interventions in the current stent era.在当前支架时代,对14133例行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者应用冠状动脉造影和介入学会病变分类系统的评估。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 Jan;55(1):1-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10074.
5
[The classification of coronary lesion from Society for Cardiac Angiography and Intervention predicts better results of coronary angioplasty than the one from American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Coronary Disease].[与美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会冠状动脉疾病分类相比,心脏血管造影和介入学会的冠状动脉病变分类能更好地预测冠状动脉血管成形术的结果]
Rev Med Chil. 2001 Jun;129(6):605-10.
6
Value of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stenosis morphology classification for coronary interventions in the late 1990s.20世纪90年代后期美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会冠状动脉狭窄形态学分类在冠状动脉介入治疗中的价值。
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Jul 1;82(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00239-2.
7
Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group.
Circulation. 1990 Oct;82(4):1193-202. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.4.1193.
8
Development and validation of simplified predictive index for major complications in contemporary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty practice. The Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.当代经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术主要并发症简化预测指标的开发与验证。心脏血管造影和介入学会注册委员会。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Oct;26(4):931-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00294-4.
9
2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.2016年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠状动脉疾病患者双联抗血小板治疗时长的聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告:2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南、2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会冠状动脉旁路移植手术指南、2012年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国内科医师学会/美国胸外科医师协会/美国预防心脏病学会/心血管造影和介入学会/美国胸外科医师学会稳定型缺血性心脏病患者诊断和管理指南、2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南、2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南以及2014年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会非心脏手术患者围手术期心血管评估和管理指南的更新
Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e123-55. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000404. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
10
Predictors of success and major complications for primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. An analysis of the 1990 to 1994 Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions registries.急性心肌梗死患者直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术成功及发生主要并发症的预测因素。对1990年至1994年心血管造影和介入学会登记资料的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Jul;30(1):201-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00102-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Utility of the ACC/AHA Lesion Classification to Predict Outcomes After Contemporary DES Treatment: Individual Patient Data Pooled Analysis From 7 Randomized Trials.ACC/AHA 病变分类对当代 DES 治疗后结局的预测价值:来自 7 项随机试验的个体患者数据合并分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e025275. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025275. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
2
Changing trends in the incidence, management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation over an 11-year period: single-centre experience.在 11 年期间,冠状动脉穿孔的发生率、处理和结果的变化趋势:单中心经验。
Open Heart. 2022 Apr;9(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001916.
3
Do plaque-related factors affect the diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence coronary-assisted diagnosis system? Comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
斑块相关因素是否会影响人工智能冠状动脉辅助诊断系统的诊断性能?与有创冠状动脉造影的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Mar;32(3):1866-1878. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08299-6. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
4
Relation between the ankle-brachial index and the complexity of coronary artery disease in older patients.老年患者踝臂指数与冠状动脉疾病复杂性的关系。
Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1611-6. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S52778. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
5
Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study.ST段抬高型心肌梗死入院患者门球时间与死亡率的关联:全国队列研究
BMJ. 2009 May 19;338:b1807. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1807.
6
[Premedication visits. Economizing at the cost of the patient?].[术前用药问诊。以患者为代价节约成本?]
Anaesthesist. 2004 Sep;53(9):862-70. doi: 10.1007/s00101-004-0709-x.