Kaskutas Lee Ann, Witbrodt Jane, French Michael T
Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 2000 Hearst Ave., Suite 300, Berkeley, California 94709-2176, USA.
J Stud Alcohol. 2004 May;65(3):371-82. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.371.
The purpose of this study was to estimate the outcomes and costs of day hospital and nonmedical community-based day treatment for chemical dependency.
A community sample of 271 adults (179 men) dependent on alcohol and/or drugs was recruited and randomized to either a hospital-based (medical) day treatment program or to a community-based (nonmedical) day treatment program. The day hospital (DH) program lasted for 3 weeks. One community-based program (CP2) lasted for 4 weeks, and the other (CP1) lasted for 6 weeks but with shorter treatment days and more criminal justice clients. Because of our concerns regarding treatment fidelity, we replaced CP1 with CP2 as the randomization site for the nonmedical, community-based arm of the trial halfway through the study.
Abstinence rates were similar between DH and CP2 subjects, with 53% and 60% of each group, respectively, reporting no drinking for the 30 days preceding both follow-up interviews. DH subjects were less likely than those in either of the nonmedical programs to report medical problems at both follow-ups. Average episode costs per client were significantly (p < .01) lower at CP1 (dollars 526) than at DH (dollars 1,274) or CP2 (dollars 1,163). A pattern of weaker effects was observed at the less costly problematic community program (CP1), including less abstinence than was reported at CP2 (only 40% of CP1 subjects were alcohol free at both follow-ups) and worse psychiatric, family/friend and employment outcomes than were reported at DH or CP2.
Our results not only demonstrate the clinical diversity that exists between nonmedical, community-based day treatment programs but also show that nonmedical programs can compete with DH treatment in cost as well as in most outcomes.
本研究旨在评估日间医院治疗和非医疗社区日间戒毒治疗的效果及成本。
招募了271名依赖酒精和/或药物的成年社区样本(179名男性),并将其随机分为基于医院的(医疗)日间治疗项目或基于社区的(非医疗)日间治疗项目。日间医院(DH)项目持续3周。一个基于社区的项目(CP2)持续4周,另一个(CP1)持续6周,但治疗天数较短且刑事司法客户较多。由于我们对治疗保真度的担忧,在研究进行到一半时,我们用CP2取代了CP1作为试验中非医疗社区组的随机分组地点。
DH组和CP2组的戒酒率相似,在两次随访前的30天内,每组分别有53%和60%的人报告未饮酒。在两次随访中,DH组的受试者比两个非医疗项目中的任何一个报告有医疗问题的可能性都小。CP1组每位客户的平均治疗费用(526美元)显著低于DH组(1274美元)或CP2组(1163美元)(p < 0.01)。在成本较低的有问题的社区项目(CP1)中观察到一种效果较弱的模式,包括戒酒率低于CP2组(在两次随访中,只有40%的CP1组受试者没有饮酒),并且在精神、家庭/朋友和就业方面的结果比DH组或CP2组更差。
我们的结果不仅证明了非医疗社区日间治疗项目之间存在的临床差异,还表明非医疗项目在成本以及大多数结果方面可以与DH治疗相竞争。