Guest Jodie L, Ruffin Charnelda, Tschampa Jean M, DeSilva Kathryn E, Rimland David
Infectious Disease Section, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Jun;24(6):727-35. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.8.727.36071.
To determine and compare rates of diarrhea in patients receiving an antiretroviral regimen containing lopinavir-ritonavir versus nelfinavir and in patients who received these drugs sequentially.
Retrospective cohort analysis.
Hospital-based human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinic.
Four hundred one participants in the HIV Atlanta VA Cohort Study who were prescribed lopinavir-ritonavir or nelfinavir from 1996-2002.
Chart review identified episodes of diarrhea that potentially were associated with an antiretroviral agent. Data collected included antidiarrheal agents dispensed, baseline viral load and CD4+ cell counts, demographic variables, and previous therapy Diarrhea associated with an antiretroviral regimen occurred in 175 (49%) of 354 patients receiving nelfinavir and 17 (17%) of 99 patients receiving lopinavir-ritonavir (p < 0.001). Treatment for the diarrhea occurred in 118 (33%) of 354 patients receiving nelfinavir and 9 (9%) of 99 receiving lopinavir-ritonavir (p < 0.001). Patients in the lopinavir-ritonavir group were more likely to have received highly active antiretroviral therapy and azithromycin than patients receiving nelfinavir, and they had lower baseline CD4+ cell counts (p < or = 0.01 for each comparison). The average number of months/person-year of diarrhea treatment was 2.0 for the nelfinavir group and 0.13 for the lopinavir-ritonavir group. Of the 10 antiretroviral-naive patients who received lopinavir-ritonavir, none needed treatment for diarrhea, whereas 78 (36%) of 217 antiretroviral-naive patients who received nelfinavir required treatment for diarrhea. Of the 52 patients who had been taking nelfinavir and were switched to lopinavir-ritonavir, they were more likely to start antidiarrheal treatment while taking nelfinavir (14 [27%]) than while receiving lopinavir-ritonavir (3 [6%]) (p = 0.004).
Patients receiving lopinavir-ritonavir were significantly less likely to have diarrhea or to require treatment for diarrhea than patients receiving nelfinavir. The same results occurred when the drugs were given to the same patients sequentially (nelfinavir followed by lopinavir-ritonavir). The diarrhea associated with lopinavir-ritonavir was less frequent, less severe, and shorter in duration than diarrhea associated with nelfinavir.
确定并比较接受含洛匹那韦-利托那韦的抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的患者与接受奈非那韦的患者以及序贯接受这两种药物治疗的患者的腹泻发生率。
回顾性队列分析。
以医院为基础的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)诊所。
401名参与亚特兰大退伍军人事务部HIV队列研究的参与者,他们在1996年至2002年期间被处方使用洛匹那韦-利托那韦或奈非那韦。
通过病历审查确定可能与抗逆转录病毒药物相关的腹泻发作。收集的数据包括所配发的止泻药、基线病毒载量和CD4+细胞计数、人口统计学变量以及既往治疗情况。接受奈非那韦治疗的354名患者中有175名(49%)出现了与抗逆转录病毒治疗方案相关的腹泻,而接受洛匹那韦-利托那韦治疗的99名患者中有17名(17%)出现腹泻(p<0.001)。接受奈非那韦治疗的354名患者中有118名(33%)因腹泻接受了治疗,而接受洛匹那韦-利托那韦治疗的99名患者中有9名(9%)接受了腹泻治疗(p<0.001)。与接受奈非那韦的患者相比,洛匹那韦-利托那韦组的患者更有可能接受高效抗逆转录病毒治疗和阿奇霉素治疗,且他们的基线CD4+细胞计数更低(每项比较p≤0.01)。奈非那韦组腹泻治疗的平均月/人年数为2.0,洛匹那韦-利托那韦组为0.13。在10名初治且接受洛匹那韦-利托那韦治疗的患者中,无人因腹泻需要治疗,而在217名初治且接受奈非那韦治疗的患者中有78名(36%)需要腹泻治疗。在52名曾服用奈非那韦并换用洛匹那韦-利托那韦的患者中,他们在服用奈非那韦时开始止泻治疗的可能性(14名[27%])高于服用洛匹那韦-利托那韦时(3名[6%])(p=0.004)。
与接受奈非那韦的患者相比,接受洛匹那韦-利托那韦的患者出现腹泻或因腹泻需要治疗的可能性显著更低。当这两种药物先后给予同一批患者(先奈非那韦后洛匹那韦-利托那韦)时,也出现了相同的结果。与奈非那韦相关的腹泻相比,与洛匹那韦-利托那韦相关的腹泻频率更低、严重程度更低且持续时间更短。