Kallstrom Thomas J
Respiratory Care Services, Fairview Hospital, Cleveland OH 44111, USA.
Respir Care. 2004 Jul;49(7):783-92.
In 2002 the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program published evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma, but there are some unresolved asthma-management issues that need further research. For asthmatic children inhaled corticosteroids are more beneficial than as-needed use of beta(2) agonists, long-acting beta(2) agonists, theophylline, cromolyn sodium, nedocromil, or any combination of those. Leukotriene modifiers are an alternative but not a preferred treatment; they should be considered if the medication needs to be administered orally rather than via inhalation. Cromolyn sodium and nedocromil are effective long-term asthma-control medications, but they are not as effective as inhaled corticosteroids. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether cromolyn benefits maintenance of childhood asthma. Cromolyn sodium and nedocromil are alternatives, but not preferred treatments for mild persistent asthma. Cromolyn may be useful as a preventive therapy prior to exertion or unavoidable exposure to allergens. Regular inhalation of corticosteroids controls asthma significantly better than as-needed beta(2) agonists. No studies have examined the long-term impact of regular inhaled corticosteroids on lung function in children <or= 5 years old. As monotherapy, inhaled corticosteroids are more effective than long-acting beta(2) agonists. The asthma-control benefit of inhaled corticosteroids decidedly outweighs the risks from inhaled corticosteroids. There is no high-level evidence that low-to-medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids have ocular toxicity or important effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function in children. Antibiotic therapy has no role in asthma management unless there is a bacterial comorbidity, but further research is needed on the relationship between sinusitis and asthma exacerbation. The asthma care plan should include a written asthma action plan for the patient, but there is inadequate evidence as to whether the asthma action plan should be based on symptoms or on peak flow monitoring. There is low-level evidence that helium-oxygen mixture (heliox) may be of benefit in the first hour of an acute asthma attack but less advantageous after that first hour. Metered-dose inhalers are no more or less effective, overall, than other aerosol-delivery devices for the delivery of beta(2) agonists or inhaled corticosteroids, so the least expensive delivery method should be chosen.
2002年,国家哮喘教育与预防计划发布了基于证据的哮喘诊断和管理指南,但仍存在一些未解决的哮喘管理问题,需要进一步研究。对于哮喘儿童,吸入性糖皮质激素比按需使用β₂受体激动剂、长效β₂受体激动剂、茶碱、色甘酸钠、奈多罗米或这些药物的任何组合更有益。白三烯调节剂是一种替代疗法,但并非首选治疗方法;如果药物需要口服而非吸入给药,则应考虑使用。色甘酸钠和奈多罗米是有效的长期哮喘控制药物,但它们不如吸入性糖皮质激素有效。没有足够的证据来确定色甘酸钠是否对儿童哮喘的维持有益。色甘酸钠和奈多罗米是替代疗法,但并非轻度持续性哮喘的首选治疗方法。色甘酸钠在运动前或不可避免地接触过敏原之前作为预防性治疗可能有用。定期吸入糖皮质激素比按需使用β₂受体激动剂能更好地控制哮喘。没有研究考察过定期吸入糖皮质激素对5岁及以下儿童肺功能的长期影响。作为单一疗法,吸入性糖皮质激素比长效β₂受体激动剂更有效。吸入性糖皮质激素对哮喘的控制益处明显超过其风险。没有高级别证据表明低至中剂量吸入性糖皮质激素对儿童有眼毒性或对下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺功能有重要影响。除非存在细菌合并症,抗生素治疗在哮喘管理中不起作用,但鼻窦炎与哮喘加重之间的关系还需要进一步研究。哮喘护理计划应包括为患者制定的书面哮喘行动计划,但关于哮喘行动计划应基于症状还是基于峰流速监测,证据不足。有低级别证据表明,氦氧混合气(氦氧)在急性哮喘发作的第一小时可能有益,但在第一小时之后益处较小。总体而言,定量吸入器在递送β₂受体激动剂或吸入性糖皮质激素方面,与其他气雾剂递送装置相比,效果并无优劣之分,因此应选择最便宜的递送方法。