Herridge Matt L, Harrison David W, Mollet Gina A, Shenal Brian V
CAMC Cardiac Rehabilitation, 3200 MacCorkle Ave. S.E., Charleston, WV 25304, USA.
Brain Cogn. 2004 Aug;55(3):564-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.04.004.
The effects of hostility and a cold pressor stressor on the accuracy of facial affect perception were examined in the present experiment. A mechanism whereby physiological arousal level is mediated by systems which also mediate accuracy of an individual's interpretation of affective cues is described. Right-handed participants were classified as high hostile (N = 28) or low hostile (N = 28) using the Cook Medley Hostility Scale. The high-hostile group met joint selection criteria. Only high-hostile participants who showed cardiovascular reactivity to the cold pressor, with systolic BP change exceeding the group mean were included. Groups were further subdivided into cold pressor and non-cold pressor test conditions. It was predicted that high-hostile men, relative to low-hostile men, would show decreased perceptual accuracy when presented with happy, angry, and neutral facial configurations within the left visual field (LVF). Results indicated that high-hostile men were less accurate than low-hostile men in the LVF. Further, pre-stress accuracy scores in the high-hostile men were similar to the post-stress accuracy scores of the low-hostile men. The lateralization of affective function and the role of physiological arousal in affective facial perception are discussed.
在本实验中,研究了敌意和冷加压应激源对面部表情感知准确性的影响。描述了一种生理唤醒水平由同时介导个体对情感线索解释准确性的系统调节的机制。使用库克-梅德利敌意量表将右利手参与者分为高敌意组(N = 28)和低敌意组(N = 28)。高敌意组符合联合选择标准。仅纳入对冷加压有心血管反应且收缩压变化超过组均值的高敌意参与者。将两组进一步细分为冷加压测试条件组和非冷加压测试条件组。预计相对于低敌意男性,高敌意男性在左视野(LVF)中呈现快乐、愤怒和中性面部表情时,其感知准确性会降低。结果表明,高敌意男性在左视野中的准确性低于低敌意男性。此外,高敌意男性的应激前准确性得分与低敌意男性的应激后准确性得分相似。讨论了情感功能的侧化以及生理唤醒在情感面部感知中的作用。