Lory John A, Massey Raymond E, Zulovich Joseph M, Hoehne John A, Schmidt Amy M, Carlson Marcia S, Fulhage Charles D
Department of Agronomy, 210 Waters Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
J Environ Qual. 2004 May-Jun;33(3):1106-13. doi: 10.2134/jeq2004.1106.
Water quality concerns and revised regulations are changing how confined animal feeding operations manage manure. Devising acceptable and feasible changes in manure practices requires a full understanding of the forces shaping current manure management decisions. Previous theoretical models have shown that a wide range of factors influence the lowest cost solution for manure management. We used a mechanistic model to characterize the manure management practices on 39 swine operations (20 unagitated lagoon and 19 slurry operations) in five states (Iowa, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania). Information was collected from each operation about animal numbers, feed and water use, manure handling and storage characteristics, field locations, crop rotation, fertilizer need, and equipment inventory and usage. Collected data were used as input and to validate results from a mechanistic model that determined acres required for manure application, manure application rate, time required for manure application, value of manure, and costs of manure management. The 39 farms had a mean of 984 animal units (AU) per operation, 18.2 AU ha(-1) (7.4 AU acre(-1)), and manure application costs of dollar 10.49 AU(-1) yr(-1). Significant factors affecting manure management included operation size, manure handling system, state, and ownership structure. Larger operations had lower manure management costs (r2 = 0.32). Manure value potentially exceeded manure application costs on 58% of slurry and 15% of lagoon operations. But 38% of slurry operations needed to apply manure off the farm whereas all lagoon operations had sufficient land for N-based manure management. Manure management was a higher percentage of gross income on contract operations compared with independents (P < 0.01). This research emphasized the importance of site-specific factors affecting manure management decisions and the economics of U.S. swine operations.
水质问题和修订后的法规正在改变集约化动物饲养场对粪便的管理方式。要制定可接受且可行的粪便管理变革措施,就需要全面了解影响当前粪便管理决策的各种因素。以往的理论模型表明,众多因素会影响粪便管理的最低成本解决方案。我们使用一个机理模型来描述五个州(爱荷华州、密苏里州、北卡罗来纳州、俄克拉何马州和宾夕法尼亚州)39个养猪场(20个未搅拌泻湖式和19个 slurry 式养殖场)的粪便管理实践。从每个养殖场收集了有关动物数量、饲料和水的使用、粪便处理和储存特征、田地位置、作物轮作、肥料需求以及设备清单和使用情况的信息。收集到的数据用作输入,并用于验证一个机理模型的结果,该模型确定了粪便施用所需的英亩数、粪便施用量、粪便施用所需时间、粪便价值以及粪便管理成本。这39个农场每个养殖场平均有984个动物单位(AU),每公顷18.2个 AU(每英亩7.4个 AU),粪便管理成本为每年每个 AU 10.49美元。影响粪便管理的重要因素包括养殖场规模、粪便处理系统、州以及所有权结构。规模较大的养殖场粪便管理成本较低(r2 = 0.32)。在58%的 slurry 式养殖场和15%的泻湖式养殖场,粪便价值可能超过粪便施用成本。但38%的 slurry 式养殖场需要将粪便施用到场外,而所有泻湖式养殖场都有足够的土地进行基于氮的粪便管理。与独立经营的养殖场相比,合同经营的养殖场粪便管理占总收入的比例更高(P < 0.01)。这项研究强调了影响粪便管理决策的特定场地因素以及美国养猪场经营的经济因素的重要性。