[Prognostic value of noninvasive markers of coronary reperfusion compared to TIMI 3 flow in patients treated with primary angioplasty].

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic value of TIMI 3 flow versus noninvasive markers of coronary artery reperfusion on the outcome of patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with primary angioplasty. PATIENTS AND METHOD We analyzed 172 consecutive patients with AMI and ST-segment elevation, who were treated with primary angioplasty within 12 hours of admission. Mean age was 6113 years, 77% were men, and 56% had a history of previous AMI.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 3.6%; 16.6% developed heart failure, and 11.1% had complex arrhythmias during their hospital stay. The noninvasive criterion for successful reperfusion was the presence of two or more markers of reperfusion based on ECG changes or CK levels after angioplasty. Reperfusion was successful in 87.7% of the patients, and TIMI 3 flow was achieved in 87%. There was no significant concordance between the two methods (kappa index = 0.012). Multivariate analysis showed that both successful reperfusion (OR=0.028; 95% CI, 0.003-0.268) and TIMI 3 flow (OR=0.104; 95% CI, 0.019-0.563) were protective for in-hospital mortality. However, in the multivariate analysis only successful reperfusion was a protective factor for heart failure and complex arrhythmias.

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirm that both TIMI 3 flow and successful coronary reperfusion evaluated noninvasively show independent prognostic value in patients with AMI treated with primary angioplasty. Noninvasive markers of coronary reperfusion should be used as complementary to angiography in these patients.