Davis Cindy D, Milner John
NIH/NCI, Nutritional Sciences Research Group, 6130 Executive Blvd, MSC 7328, Rockville, MD 20892-7328, USA.
Mutat Res. 2004 Jul 13;551(1-2):51-64. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.01.012.
While dietary habits continue to surface as a significant factor that may influence cancer incidence and tumor behavior, there is considerable scientific uncertainty about who will benefit most. Adequate [corrected] knowledge about how the responses depend on an individual's genetic background (nutrigenetic effects), the cumulative effects of food components on genetic expression profiles (nutritional transcriptomics and nutritional epigenomics effects), the occurrence and activity of proteins (proteomic effects) and/or the dose and temporal changes in cellular small molecular weight compounds (metabolomics effects) will [corrected] assist in identifying responders and non-responders. Expanding the information about similarities and differences in the "omic" responses across tissues will not only provide clues about specificity in response to bioactive food components but assist in the identification of surrogate tissues and biomarkers that can be used for predicting a response. Deciphering the importance of each of these potential sites of regulation will be particularly challenging but does hold promise in explaining many of the inconsistencies in the literature.
虽然饮食习惯仍然是可能影响癌症发病率和肿瘤行为的重要因素,但对于谁将从中受益最多,仍存在相当大的科学不确定性。关于反应如何取决于个体的遗传背景(营养遗传学效应)、食物成分对基因表达谱的累积效应(营养转录组学和营养表观基因组学效应)、蛋白质的发生和活性(蛋白质组学效应)以及/或细胞中小分子化合物的剂量和时间变化(代谢组学效应)的充分知识,将有助于识别反应者和无反应者。扩展关于不同组织中“组学”反应异同的信息,不仅将为生物活性食物成分反应的特异性提供线索,还将有助于识别可用于预测反应的替代组织和生物标志物。解读这些潜在调控位点中每一个的重要性将极具挑战性,但有望解释文献中的许多不一致之处。