Holland Jimmie C
Wayne E. Chapman Chair of Psychiatric Oncology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Psychooncology. 2004 Jul;13(7):445-59. doi: 10.1002/pon.812.
Around the world, traditionally the diagnosis of cancer and its prognosis was withheld from patients for centuries, due to the stigma and fears attached to it. This custom of 'never telling' precluded talking with patients about their feelings and how they were coping with illness and the threat of death. In the last quarter of the twentieth century, patient's right of access to information, coupled with the diminished stigma attached to cancer, encouraged physicians into a more open dialogue. In the majority of countries today, patients learn their diagnosis and know their treatment options. This change permitted the first formal psychosocial studies of patients in the 1950s, and the beginning of research into coping and development of interventions to improve quality of life. However, a second independent stigma, also present for centuries, has persisted: the stigma associated with mental disorders (even in the context of severe physical illness). This prejudice about mental problems has been a barrier to the integration of the psychosocial domain into total cancer care; the identification of patients who are distressed; and, patient's acceptance of psychological help. Despite these barriers, psychosocial oncology has developed worldwide, with a small, but active cadre of investigators and clinicians engaging in clinical, educational and research aspects of psycho-oncology. The International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS), since 1984, has brought them together. The Sutherland Memorial Lecture has honored nine individuals from five countries who have made major contributions to the field: 1982, Avery Weisman; 1984, Bernard Fox; 1987, Morton Bard; 1991, Margit von Kerekjarto; 1993, Ned Cassem; 1996, Steven Greer; 1998, Hiroomi Kawano; 2000, Robert Zittoun; and 2003, Jimmie Holland. The scientific base for psychosocial oncology is now secure with a body of knowledge, textbooks and journals which have led to the development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for psychosocial services in several countries. A benchmark now exists against which care can be monitored and accountability established. The next 25 years will see an improvement in the psychosocial care of patients, based on research that gives a scientific basis for interventions, and a reduction in the barriers to psychosocial care in cancer.
在世界各地,由于与癌症相关的污名和恐惧,几个世纪以来,传统上一直对患者隐瞒癌症诊断及其预后情况。这种“从不告知”的习俗使得无法与患者谈论他们的感受以及他们如何应对疾病和死亡威胁。在20世纪最后25年,患者获取信息的权利,再加上与癌症相关的污名有所减轻,促使医生展开更开放的对话。如今在大多数国家,患者会得知自己的诊断结果并了解治疗选择。这一变化使得在20世纪50年代首次对患者进行了正式的心理社会研究,并开启了对应对方式的研究以及为改善生活质量而开展干预措施的研究。然而,另一种同样存在了几个世纪的独立污名一直持续存在:与精神障碍相关的污名(即使是在严重身体疾病的背景下)。这种对精神问题的偏见一直是将心理社会领域纳入全面癌症护理、识别痛苦的患者以及患者接受心理帮助的障碍。尽管存在这些障碍,心理肿瘤学在全球范围内仍得到了发展,有一小批但积极活跃的研究人员和临床医生从事心理肿瘤学的临床、教育和研究工作。自1984年以来,国际心理肿瘤学会(IPOS)将他们汇聚在一起。萨瑟兰纪念讲座表彰了来自五个国家的九位对该领域做出重大贡献的人士:1982年,艾弗里·韦斯曼;1984年,伯纳德·福克斯;1987年,莫顿·巴德;1991年,玛吉特·冯·凯雷克亚托;1993年,内德·卡森;1996年,史蒂文·格里尔;1998年,川野浩美;2000年,罗伯特·齐图恩;以及2003年,吉米·霍兰德。心理肿瘤学的科学基础如今已稳固确立,有了一系列知识、教科书和期刊,这促成了一些国家基于证据制定心理社会服务临床实践指南。现在有了一个基准,据此可以监测护理情况并确立问责制。基于为干预措施提供科学依据的研究,未来25年患者的心理社会护理将会得到改善,癌症心理社会护理的障碍也会减少。