Freishtat Robert J, Klein Bruce L, Teach Stephen J, Johns Christina M S, Arapian Linda S, Perraut Michael E, Chamberlain James M
Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Medical Center, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20010-2970, USA.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Jul;20(7):443-7. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000132224.73223.17.
The objective of this investigation was to determine if an existing general severity of illness measure describing pediatric emergency patients, calculated at referring hospitals, predicts the need for hospital admission and intensive care unit (ICU) admission at receiving hospitals.
A consecutive series of interhospital transports to an urban pediatric tertiary care hospital from other emergency departments (EDs) during a 1-year period were studied. The pediatric risk of admission score, a validated emergency department measure of severity of illness, was calculated by the transport team leader on arrival at the referring hospital using data available at that time. Outcomes examined in a logistic regression model and receiver operating characteristic curves included the need for hospital admission and ICU admission.
From 52 referring emergency departments, 1920 consecutive interhospital transport records were analyzed. Of these, 1557 (81.1%) patients were ultimately admitted to the receiving hospital, including 131 (6.8%) to the ICU. Logistic regression for hospital admission demonstrated a significant independent association with higher age, higher pediatric risk of admission, trauma diagnosis, and the lack of a pediatric inpatient service. The receiver operating characteristic curve for hospital admission [area under the curve = 0.612 (0.576, 0.647)] was not useful to determine a suitable cut point below which hospital admission was unlikely to occur. Pediatric risk of admission score performance as a predictor of ICU admission by receiver operating characteristic curve was only slightly better (area under the curve = 0.721 [0.653, 0.788]).
This form of the pediatric risk of admission score is not practical as a predictor of hospital and ICU admission among pediatric interhospital transport. Specific calibration could increase its utility for the transport population. This in turn may contribute to more effective interhospital transport triage and more efficient allocation of transport resources.
本研究旨在确定在转诊医院计算得出的一种描述儿科急诊患者的现有疾病总体严重程度指标,能否预测接收医院的住院需求和重症监护病房(ICU)收治需求。
对1年期间从其他急诊科(ED)连续转运至一家城市儿科三级护理医院的一系列院际转运病例进行研究。转运团队负责人在抵达转诊医院时,根据当时可得的数据计算儿科入院风险评分,这是一种经过验证的急诊科疾病严重程度指标。在逻辑回归模型和受试者工作特征曲线中检验的结局包括住院需求和ICU收治需求。
分析了来自52家转诊急诊科的1920份连续院际转运记录。其中,1557例(81.1%)患者最终被接收医院收治,包括131例(6.8%)入住ICU。住院的逻辑回归显示,年龄较大、儿科入院风险较高、创伤诊断以及缺乏儿科住院服务与之存在显著独立关联。住院的受试者工作特征曲线[曲线下面积 = 0.612(0.576,0.647)]对于确定一个合适的切点并无帮助,低于该切点不太可能发生住院情况。儿科入院风险评分作为ICU收治预测指标的受试者工作特征曲线表现仅略好一些(曲线下面积 = 0.721 [0.653,0.788])。
这种形式的儿科入院风险评分作为儿科院际转运中住院和ICU收治的预测指标并不实用。进行特定校准可能会提高其在转运人群中的效用。这反过来可能有助于更有效的院际转运转诊,并更高效地分配转运资源。