Suppr超能文献

药物性房室传导阻滞:停用致病药物后的预后

Drug-induced atrioventricular block: prognosis after discontinuation of the culprit drug.

作者信息

Zeltser David, Justo Dan, Halkin Amir, Rosso Raphael, Ish-Shalom Maya, Hochenberg Mordechai, Viskin Sami

机构信息

Internal Medicine D, Tel Aviv-Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jul 7;44(1):105-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.057.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine how often atrioventricular (AV) block is really caused by medications.

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers, verapamil, and diltiazem are considered a cause of AV block for which pacemaker implantation is not indicated. However, it is not known if such patients can expect a benign course after discontinuation of the culprit medication.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with II or III degree AV block not related to acute myocardial infarction, digitalis toxicity, or vasovagal syncope were studied. The level of AV block (AV-nodal or infranodal) was defined by electrocardiographic criteria. The cause and effect relation between AV block and drugs was defined according to the response to drug discontinuation.

RESULTS

Of 169 patients with AV block, 92 (54%) were receiving beta-blockers and/or verapamil or diltiazem. Patients receiving medications had similar clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics with patients who had AV block in the absence of drugs. Drug discontinuation was followed by resolution of AV block in 41% of cases, whereas spontaneous improvement of AV conduction occurred in 23% of patients who had AV block in the absence of drugs. However, 56% of the patients for whom drug discontinuation led to resolution of AV block had recurrence of AV block in the absence of therapy. Atrioventricular block that was "truly caused by drugs" was found in only 15% of patients who had II or III degree AV block during therapy with beta-blockers, verapamil, or diltiazem.

CONCLUSIONS

Atrioventricular block is commonly "related to drugs" but is rarely "caused by drugs."

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定房室(AV)阻滞真正由药物引起的频率。

背景

β受体阻滞剂、维拉帕米和地尔硫䓬被认为是导致AV阻滞的原因,对于此类情况不建议植入起搏器。然而,尚不清楚此类患者在停用致病药物后是否能有良性病程。

方法

对连续的患有二度或三度AV阻滞且与急性心肌梗死、洋地黄中毒或血管迷走性晕厥无关的患者进行研究。AV阻滞的程度(房室结或结下)根据心电图标准定义。根据停药后的反应确定AV阻滞与药物之间的因果关系。

结果

在169例AV阻滞患者中,92例(54%)正在接受β受体阻滞剂和/或维拉帕米或地尔硫䓬治疗。接受药物治疗的患者与未使用药物而发生AV阻滞的患者具有相似的临床和心电图特征。停药后,41%的病例AV阻滞得到缓解,而在未使用药物而发生AV阻滞的患者中,23%的患者AV传导自发改善。然而,停药后AV阻滞得到缓解的患者中,56%在未接受治疗的情况下AV阻滞复发。在使用β受体阻滞剂、维拉帕米或地尔硫䓬治疗期间发生二度或三度AV阻滞的患者中,仅15%的患者的AV阻滞是“真正由药物引起的”。

结论

房室阻滞通常“与药物有关”,但很少“由药物引起”。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验