Suppr超能文献

在种间序列变异背景下对人类BRCA1中错义变异的分析。

Analysis of missense variation in human BRCA1 in the context of interspecific sequence variation.

作者信息

Abkevich V, Zharkikh A, Deffenbaugh A M, Frank D, Chen Y, Shattuck D, Skolnick M H, Gutin A, Tavtigian S V

机构信息

Myriad Genetics, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.

出版信息

J Med Genet. 2004 Jul;41(7):492-507. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.015867.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Interpretation of results from mutation screening of tumour suppressor genes known to harbour high risk susceptibility mutations, such as APC, BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, MSH2, TP53, and PTEN, is becoming an increasingly important part of clinical practice. Interpretation of truncating mutations, gene rearrangements, and obvious splice junction mutations, is generally straightforward. However, classification of missense variants often presents a difficult problem. From a series of 20,000 full sequence tests of BRCA1 carried out at Myriad Genetic Laboratories, a total of 314 different missense changes and eight in-frame deletions were observed. Before this study, only 21 of these missense changes were classified as deleterious or suspected deleterious and 14 as neutral or of little clinical significance.

METHODS

We have used a combination of a multiple sequence alignment of orthologous BRCA1 sequences and a measure of the chemical difference between the amino acids present at individual residues in the sequence alignment to classify missense variants and in-frame deletions detected during mutation screening of BRCA1.

RESULTS

In the present analysis we were able to classify an additional 50 missense variants and two in-frame deletions as probably deleterious and 92 missense variants as probably neutral. Thus we have tentatively classified about 50% of the unclassified missense variants observed during clinical testing of BRCA1.

DISCUSSION

An internal test of the analysis is consistent with our classification of the variants designated probably deleterious; however, we must stress that this classification is tentative and does not have sufficient independent confirmation to serve as a clinically applicable stand alone method.

摘要

引言

对已知携带高风险易感突变的肿瘤抑制基因(如APC、BRCA1、BRCA2、MLH1、MSH2、TP53和PTEN)进行突变筛查结果的解读,正日益成为临床实践的重要组成部分。对截短突变、基因重排和明显的剪接连接突变的解读通常比较直接。然而,错义变异的分类往往是个难题。在Myriad遗传实验室对BRCA1进行的20000次全序列检测中,共观察到314种不同的错义变化和8种框内缺失。在本研究之前,这些错义变化中只有21种被归类为有害或疑似有害,14种被归类为中性或临床意义不大。

方法

我们结合了直系同源BRCA1序列的多序列比对以及序列比对中各个残基处氨基酸的化学差异度量,对错义变异和BRCA1突变筛查期间检测到的框内缺失进行分类。

结果

在本次分析中,我们能够将另外50种错义变异和2种框内缺失归类为可能有害,92种错义变异归类为可能中性。因此,我们初步对BRCA1临床检测期间观察到的约50%未分类错义变异进行了分类。

讨论

该分析的内部测试与我们对指定为可能有害的变异的分类一致;然而,我们必须强调,这种分类是初步的,没有足够的独立验证来作为一种临床适用的独立方法。

相似文献

1
Analysis of missense variation in human BRCA1 in the context of interspecific sequence variation.
J Med Genet. 2004 Jul;41(7):492-507. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.015867.
3
An analysis of unclassified missense substitutions in human BRCA1.
Fam Cancer. 2006;5(1):77-88. doi: 10.1007/s10689-005-2578-0.
4
Classification of BRCA1 missense variants of unknown clinical significance.
J Med Genet. 2005 Feb;42(2):138-46. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.024711.
5
Missense variants of uncertain significance (VUS) altering the phosphorylation patterns of BRCA1 and BRCA2.
PLoS One. 2013 May 21;8(5):e62468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062468. Print 2013.
6
Determination of cancer risk associated with germ line BRCA1 missense variants by functional analysis.
Cancer Res. 2007 Feb 15;67(4):1494-501. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3297.
9
A high-throughput functional complementation assay for classification of BRCA1 missense variants.
Cancer Discov. 2013 Oct;3(10):1142-55. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0094. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
10
BRCA1/2 germline missense mutations: a systematic review.
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 May;27(3):279-286. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000337.

引用本文的文献

1
A global perspective on the ethnic-specific variation and its implication in clinical application.
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2022 Dec 15;3(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.12.001. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Pathogenic variants in human DNA damage repair genes mostly arose after the latest human out-of-Africa migration.
Front Genet. 2024 Jun 14;15:1408952. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1408952. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessing the pathogenicity of variants of unknown significance: Relevance and challenges for breast cancer precision medicine.
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 18;12:1053035. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1053035. eCollection 2022.
4
Human pathogenic variants were originated during recent human history.
Life Sci Alliance. 2022 Feb 14;5(5). doi: 10.26508/lsa.202101263. Print 2022 May.
5
BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes mutations among high risk breast cancer patients in Jordan.
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 16;10(1):17573. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74250-2.
6
7
Fitting a naturally scaled point system to the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines.
Hum Mutat. 2020 Oct;41(10):1734-1737. doi: 10.1002/humu.24088. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
8
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a sample of breast and ovarian cancer families from the Colombian pacific.
Colomb Med (Cali). 2019 Sep 30;50(3):163-175. doi: 10.25100/cm.v50i3.2385.
9
10
BRCA Challenge: BRCA Exchange as a global resource for variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
PLoS Genet. 2018 Dec 26;14(12):e1007752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007752. eCollection 2018 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding missense mutations in the BRCA1 gene: an evolutionary approach.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 4;100(3):1151-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0237285100. Epub 2003 Jan 16.
3
Characterization of common BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants.
Genet Test. 2002 Summer;6(2):119-21. doi: 10.1089/10906570260199375.
4
Whole-genome shotgun assembly and analysis of the genome of Fugu rubripes.
Science. 2002 Aug 23;297(5585):1301-10. doi: 10.1126/science.1072104. Epub 2002 Jul 25.
5
Predictive identification of exonic splicing enhancers in human genes.
Science. 2002 Aug 9;297(5583):1007-13. doi: 10.1126/science.1073774. Epub 2002 Jul 11.
7
Accounting for human polymorphisms predicted to affect protein function.
Genome Res. 2002 Mar;12(3):436-46. doi: 10.1101/gr.212802.
10
Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics.
Science. 2001 Dec 14;294(5550):2348-51. doi: 10.1126/science.1067179.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验