Spurdle Amanda B, Lakhani Sunil R, Healey Sue, Parry Suzanne, Da Silva Leonard M, Brinkworth Ross, Hopper John L, Brown Melissa A, Babikyan Davit, Chenevix-Trench Georgia, Tavtigian Sean V, Goldgar David E
Queensland Institute of Medical Research, c/o Royal Brisbane Hospital Post Office, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia.
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1657-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.2779.
Rare missense substitutions and in-frame deletions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes present a challenge for genetic counseling of individuals carrying such unclassified variants. We assessed the value of tumor immunohistochemical markers in conjunction with genetic and evolutionary approaches for investigating the clinical significance of unclassified variants.
We studied 10 BRCA1 and 12 BRCA2 variants identified in Australian families with breast cancer. Analyses assumed a prior probability based on revised cross-species sequence alignment methods assessing amino acid evolutionary conservation and position, combined with likelihoods from data on co-occurrence with pathogenic mutations in the same gene, segregation analysis, and immunohistochemistry. We specifically explored the value of estrogen receptor, cytokeratin 5/6, and cytokeratin 14 as tumor markers of BRCA1 mutation status.
Posterior probabilities classified 72% of variants. BRCA1 variants IVS18+1 G>T (del exon 18) and 5632 T >A (V1838E) were classified as pathogenic, with >99% posterior probability of being deleterious, and tumor histopathology was particularly important for their classification. BRCA2 variant classification was improved over previous studies, largely by incorporating the prior probability of pathogenicity based on amino acid cross-species sequence alignments.
Variant classification was considerably improved by analysis of estrogen receptor, cytokeratin 5/6, and cytokeratin 14 tumor expression, and use of updated methods estimating the clinical relevance of amino acid evolutionary conservation and position. These methodologies may assist genetic counseling of individuals with unclassified sequence variants.
BRCA1和BRCA2基因罕见的错义替换及框内缺失给携带此类未分类变异个体的遗传咨询带来了挑战。我们评估了肿瘤免疫组化标志物结合遗传和进化方法在研究未分类变异临床意义方面的价值。
我们研究了在澳大利亚乳腺癌家族中鉴定出的10个BRCA1变异和12个BRCA2变异。分析基于修订的跨物种序列比对方法确定先验概率,该方法评估氨基酸进化保守性和位置,并结合来自同一基因中与致病突变共发生的数据、分离分析和免疫组化的似然性。我们特别探讨了雌激素受体、细胞角蛋白5/6和细胞角蛋白14作为BRCA1突变状态肿瘤标志物的价值。
后验概率对72%的变异进行了分类。BRCA1变异IVS18+1 G>T(外显子18缺失)和5632 T>A(V1838E)被分类为致病,有害的后验概率>99%,肿瘤组织病理学对其分类尤为重要。BRCA2变异分类比以往研究有所改进,主要是通过纳入基于氨基酸跨物种序列比对的致病先验概率。
通过分析雌激素受体、细胞角蛋白5/6和细胞角蛋白14的肿瘤表达,以及使用估计氨基酸进化保守性和位置临床相关性的更新方法,变异分类有了显著改善。这些方法可能有助于对具有未分类序列变异个体的遗传咨询。