Lalami Y, Paesmans M, Aoun M, Munoz-Bermeo R, Reuss K, Cherifi S, Alexopoulos C G, Klastersky J
Department of Médecine Interne and Laboratoire d'Investigations Cliniques, H-J Tagnon, Institut Jules Bordet, Centre des Tumeurs de l'Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger Bordet 1, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Oct;12(10):725-30. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0658-6.
Febrile neutropenia (FN) remains a major dose-limiting complication among patients treated with chemotherapy. Haematopoietic colony stimulating factors (G-CSF and GM-CSF) made possible a significant improvement in the management of FN, both in the therapeutic and in the prophylactic approach. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis also permits a definite reduction of severe infections during neutropenia. Nevertheless, the possible role of these two interventions for secondary prevention of FN is still unclear.
We conducted a prospective randomised trial by comparing the efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the association of G-CSF with oral antibiotics in the secondary prevention of FN. We included in our study those patients who, after an episode of FN, continued to be treated with the same chemotherapy without reduction of dose intensity. They were randomised into two groups: the first received G-CSF (group G; filgrastim, 5 microg/kg day), and the second was treated with an association of G-CSF and amoxicillin/clavulanate plus ciprofloxacin (group G/ACC).
Forty-eight patients were randomised (group G: n=23 and group G/ACC: n=25). There was no recurrence of FN among the patients receiving G-CSF and only one episode in the combined therapy group (p=1). With regard to the side effects, there was no significant difference in the two groups.
The use of G-CSF for the secondary prevention of FN is extremely effective and allows the maintenance of chemotherapy dose intensity. Our study showed that the addition of antibiotics does not seem to be required.
发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)仍然是化疗患者中主要的剂量限制性并发症。造血集落刺激因子(G-CSF和GM-CSF)使FN的治疗和预防管理都有了显著改善。抗生素预防的使用也确实能减少中性粒细胞减少期间的严重感染。然而,这两种干预措施对FN二级预防的潜在作用仍不明确。
我们进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,比较粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)以及G-CSF与口服抗生素联合使用在FN二级预防中的疗效。我们纳入研究的患者是那些在经历一次FN发作后,继续接受相同化疗且不降低剂量强度的患者。他们被随机分为两组:第一组接受G-CSF(G组;非格司亭,5微克/千克/天),第二组接受G-CSF与阿莫西林/克拉维酸加环丙沙星联合治疗(G/ACC组)。
48名患者被随机分组(G组:n = 23;G/ACC组:n = 25)。接受G-CSF的患者中没有FN复发,联合治疗组仅出现1次发作(p = 1)。关于副作用,两组之间没有显著差异。
使用G-CSF进行FN的二级预防非常有效,并能维持化疗剂量强度。我们的研究表明似乎不需要添加抗生素。