Multidisciplinary Oncology Institute, Clinique de Genolier, 1, route du Muids, 1272 Genolier, Switzerland.
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jan;47(1):8-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.10.013. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a major risk factor for infection-related morbidity and mortality and also a significant dose-limiting toxicity in cancer treatment. Patients developing severe (grade 3/4) or febrile neutropenia (FN) during chemotherapy frequently receive dose reductions and/or delays to their chemotherapy. This may impact the success of treatment, particularly when treatment intent is either curative or to prolong survival. In Europe, prophylactic treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs), such as filgrastim (including approved biosimilars), lenograstim or pegfilgrastim is available to reduce the risk of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. However, the use of G-CSF prophylactic treatment varies widely in clinical practice, both in the timing of therapy and in the patients to whom it is offered. The need for generally applicable, European-focused guidelines led to the formation of a European Guidelines Working Party by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the publication in 2006 of guidelines for the use of G-CSF in adult cancer patients at risk of chemotherapy-induced FN. A new systematic literature review has been undertaken to ensure that recommendations are current and provide guidance on clinical practice in Europe. We recommend that patient-related adverse risk factors, such as elderly age (≥65 years) and neutrophil count be evaluated in the overall assessment of FN risk before administering each cycle of chemotherapy. It is important that after a previous episode of FN, patients receive prophylactic administration of G-CSF in subsequent cycles. We provide an expanded list of common chemotherapy regimens considered to have a high (≥20%) or intermediate (10-20%) risk of FN. Prophylactic G-CSF continues to be recommended in patients receiving a chemotherapy regimen with high risk of FN. When using a chemotherapy regimen associated with FN in 10-20% of patients, particular attention should be given to patient-related risk factors that may increase the overall risk of FN. In situations where dose-dense or dose-intense chemotherapy strategies have survival benefits, prophylactic G-CSF support is recommended. Similarly, if reductions in chemotherapy dose intensity or density are known to be associated with a poor prognosis, primary G-CSF prophylaxis may be used to maintain chemotherapy. Clinical evidence shows that filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim have clinical efficacy and we recommend the use of any of these agents to prevent FN and FN-related complications where indicated. Filgrastim biosimilars are also approved for use in Europe. While other forms of G-CSF, including biosimilars, are administered by a course of daily injections, pegfilgrastim allows once-per-cycle administration. Choice of formulation remains a matter for individual clinical judgement. Evidence from multiple low level studies derived from audit data and clinical practice suggests that some patients receive suboptimal daily G-CSFs; the use of pegfilgrastim may avoid this problem.
化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症是感染相关发病率和死亡率的一个主要危险因素,也是癌症治疗中显著的剂量限制毒性。在化疗过程中发生严重(3/4 级)或发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的患者经常接受剂量减少和/或化疗延迟。这可能会影响治疗的成功,特别是当治疗意图是治愈或延长生存时间时。在欧洲,可使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSFs)进行预防性治疗,例如非格司亭(包括已批准的生物类似物)、聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子或培非格司亭,以降低化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症的风险。然而,在临床实践中,G-CSF 预防性治疗的使用差异很大,无论是在治疗时机还是在接受治疗的患者方面。由于需要普遍适用的、以欧洲为重点的指南,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)成立了一个欧洲指南工作组,并于 2006 年发布了成人癌症患者接受化疗有发生 FN 风险时使用 G-CSF 的指南。为了确保建议是最新的,并为欧洲的临床实践提供指导,我们进行了一项新的系统文献回顾。我们建议在每次化疗周期前,根据患者相关的不良风险因素(如年龄≥65 岁和中性粒细胞计数)评估 FN 风险。重要的是,在发生 FN 后,患者在下一个周期中应预防性使用 G-CSF。我们提供了一个扩展的常见化疗方案列表,这些方案被认为具有高(≥20%)或中(10-20%)FN 风险。对于接受高 FN 风险化疗方案的患者,继续推荐预防性使用 G-CSF。当使用与 FN 相关的化疗方案在 10-20%的患者中时,应特别注意可能增加 FN 总体风险的患者相关风险因素。在使用具有生存获益的密集或强化化疗策略时,建议使用预防性 G-CSF 支持。同样,如果降低化疗剂量强度或密度与预后不良相关,则可使用初级 G-CSF 预防来维持化疗。临床证据表明,非格司亭、聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子和培非格司亭具有临床疗效,我们建议在有指征时使用这些药物中的任何一种来预防 FN 和 FN 相关并发症。非格司亭生物类似物也在欧洲获得批准。虽然其他形式的 G-CSF,包括生物类似物,通过每日注射疗程给药,但培非格司亭允许每周期给药一次。制剂选择仍然是个人临床判断的问题。来自审计数据和临床实践的多项低水平研究证据表明,一些患者接受的每日 G-CSF 剂量不足;使用培非格司亭可能会避免这个问题。