Suppr超能文献

腹股沟疝修补术中的麻醉类型与患者接受度:一项多中心随机试验

Type of anaesthesia and patient acceptance in groin hernia repair: a multicentre randomised trial.

作者信息

Nordin P, Hernell H, Unosson M, Gunnarsson U, Nilsson E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Ostersund Hospital, 831 83, Ostersund, Sweden,

出版信息

Hernia. 2004 Aug;8(3):220-5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-004-0234-5. Epub 2004 Jul 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Groin hernia repair can be performed under general (GA), regional (RA), or local (LA) anaesthesia. This multicentre randomised trial evaluates patient acceptance, satisfaction, and quality of life with these three anaesthetic alternatives in hernia surgery.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-eight patients at three hospitals were randomised to one of three groups, GA, RA, or LA. Upon discharge, they were asked to complete a specially designed questionnaire with items focusing on pain, discomfort, recovery, and overall satisfaction with the anaesthetic method used. The global quality-of-life instrument EuroQol was used for estimation of health perceived.

RESULTS

Significantly more patients in the LA group than in the RA group felt pain during surgery ( P<0.001). This pain was characterised as light or moderate and for the majority of LA patients was felt during infiltration of the anaesthetic agent. Postoperatively, patients in the LA group first felt pain significantly later than patients in the other two groups ( P=0.012) and significantly fewer LA patients consumed analgesics more than three times during the first postoperative day ( P=0.002). The results concerning nausea, vomiting, and time to first meal all favour LA. No difference was found among the three groups concerning overall satisfaction and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

In a general surgical setting, we found LA to be well tolerated and associated with significant advantages compared to GA and RA.

摘要

背景

腹股沟疝修补术可在全身麻醉(GA)、区域麻醉(RA)或局部麻醉(LA)下进行。这项多中心随机试验评估了疝手术中这三种麻醉方式下患者的接受度、满意度和生活质量。

方法

三家医院的138名患者被随机分为三组之一:GA组、RA组或LA组。出院时,要求他们完成一份专门设计的问卷,问卷项目聚焦于疼痛、不适、恢复情况以及对所采用麻醉方法的总体满意度。使用全球生活质量工具欧洲五维度健康量表(EuroQol)来评估健康感知情况。

结果

LA组中术中感到疼痛的患者明显多于RA组(P<0.001)。这种疼痛被描述为轻度或中度,且大多数LA组患者在麻醉剂浸润时感到疼痛。术后,LA组患者首次感到疼痛的时间明显晚于其他两组患者(P = 0.012),且术后第一天服用镇痛药超过三次的LA组患者明显较少(P = 0.002)。关于恶心、呕吐和首次进食时间的结果均有利于LA组。三组在总体满意度和生活质量方面未发现差异。

结论

在普通外科手术环境中,我们发现与GA和RA相比,LA耐受性良好且具有显著优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验