Georgoulias V, Kouroussis C, Agelidou A, Boukovinas I, Palamidas P, Stavrinidis E, Polyzos A, Syrigos K, Veslemes M, Toubis M, Ardavanis A, Tselepatiotis E, Vlachonikolis I
Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Greece.
Br J Cancer. 2004 Aug 2;91(3):482-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602010.
To compare irinotecan (CPT-11)+gemcitabine vs CPT-11 alone as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after docetaxel-cisplatinum-based therapy. A total of 147 evaluable, pretreated patients, with NSCLC, received either gemcitabine (1000 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8)+CPT-11 (300 mg m(-2), day 8) (Group A, n=76) or CPT-11 (300 mg m(-2), day 1) (Group B, n=71), every 3 weeks. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The objective response rate was 18.4% (95% CI: 9.71-27.14%) and 4.2% (95% CI: 0-8.90%) (P=0.009) for groups A and B, respectively. No significant differences between the two groups in terms of the median duration of response, time to tumour progression, overall survival and 1-year survival were observed. The CPT-11/gemcitabine regimen significantly improved the patients' quality of life ('general mood today' (P=0.014), 'coughing' (P=0.003) and 'intensity of symptoms' (P=0.034)) compared with CPT-11. More cycles had to be delayed (P=0.001) and required prophylactic growth factor support (P=0.001) in Group A than B. Three (3.9%) patients in Group A and eight (11.3%) in Group B developed febrile neutropenia (P=0.09); one patient died of sepsis in each group. Three additional (Group A, n=1; Group B, n=2) treatment-related deaths were observed. Grade 3-4 haematologic toxicity was comparable in the two groups except anaemia (P=0.03 in favour of CPT-11). Other nonhaematologic toxicities were mild and similar in the two groups. CPT-11+gemcitabine resulted in a higher response rate and better control of disease-related symptoms than CPT-11 alone, but without any improvement in the overall survival.
比较伊立替康(CPT-11)联合吉西他滨与单用CPT-11作为多西他赛-顺铂方案治疗后进展的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的二线治疗方案。共有147例可评估的经治NSCLC患者,每3周接受一次吉西他滨(1000 mg/m²,第1天和第8天)+CPT-11(300 mg/m²,第8天)(A组,n = 76)或CPT-11(300 mg/m²,第1天)(B组,n = 71)治疗。所有患者均评估疗效和毒性。A组和B组的客观缓解率分别为18.4%(95%CI:9.71 - 27.14%)和4.2%(95%CI:0 - 8.90%)(P = 0.009)。两组在中位缓解持续时间、肿瘤进展时间、总生存期和1年生存率方面无显著差异。与单用CPT-11相比,CPT-11/吉西他滨方案显著改善了患者的生活质量(“今日总体情绪”(P = 0.014)、“咳嗽”(P = 0.003)和“症状强度”(P = 0.034))。A组比B组有更多周期需要延迟(P = 0.001)且需要预防性生长因子支持(P = 0.001)。A组3例(3.9%)患者和B组8例(11.3%)患者发生发热性中性粒细胞减少(P = 0.09);每组各有1例患者死于败血症。另外观察到3例(A组1例,B组2例)与治疗相关的死亡。除贫血外,两组3 - 4级血液学毒性相当(有利于CPT-11,P = 0.03)。两组其他非血液学毒性均较轻且相似。与单用CPT-11相比,CPT-11联合吉西他滨导致更高的缓解率和对疾病相关症状的更好控制,但总生存期无任何改善。