Roux Franck-Emmanuel, Lubrano Vincent, Lauwers-Cances Valérie, Trémoulet Michel, Mascott Christopher R, Démonet Jean-François
Service de Neurochirurgie et INSERM 455, Hôpital Purpan, F-31059 Toulouse, France.
Brain. 2004 Aug;127(Pt 8):1796-810. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh204. Epub 2004 Jul 7.
In order to identify the cortical areas involved in the reading process and to spare them during surgery, we systematically studied cortical areas by direct cortical stimulation in patients operated on for brain tumours. Seventy-six cortical stimulation mapping studies for language were performed in 35 monolingual and 19 bi- or multilingual patients over a 5-year period. We systematically searched for reading interference areas in addition to standard naming areas using an 'awake surgery' technique for brain mapping. A 'reading aloud' task (translated into different languages in multilingual patients) was used. Brain mapping was performed in left (44 patients) and right (10 patients) hemispheres. Cortical areas involved in reading were identified according to the type of interference, location and distinctness from naming areas. Stimulation of several major hemispheric regions resulted in significant interference with reading aloud: (i) the lower part of the pre- and postcentral gyri (P < 0.00001); (ii) the dominant supramarginal, angular and the posterior part of the superior temporal gyri (P < 0.00001); (iii) in the dominant inferior and middle frontal gyri (P < 0.001); and (iv) in the posterior part of the dominant middle temporal gyrus (P < 0.05). Interferences in reading were generally found in small cortical areas, with intervening areas evoking no reading interferences. Only partial overlap between reading and naming sites was found. Reading-specific sites were preferentially found when stimulating dominant inferior parietal or posterior temporal areas. Different types of reading interferences were noted. While 'articulatory' interferences were found in pre- and postcentral gyri bilaterally, and ocular-induced movements in bilateral middle frontal gyri, paraphasias were found mainly in the dominant supramarginal and posterior superior temporal gyri. Reading arrest sites were found in many regions. Reading interference sites were also occasionally found in the non-dominant hemisphere. In bilingual patients, if common cortical areas could be found, language- and reading-specific areas were sometimes detected, lending support to the concept that bilinguals can have relatively distinct cortical representation of their language skills. Finally, in this series, the location of reading interference sites and their relative specialization showed considerable individual variability.
为了确定阅读过程中涉及的皮质区域,并在手术中使其免受损伤,我们通过对脑肿瘤手术患者进行直接皮质刺激,系统地研究了皮质区域。在5年时间里,对35名单语患者和19名双语或多语患者进行了76次语言皮质刺激映射研究。我们使用“清醒手术”脑图谱技术,除了标准命名区域外,系统地寻找阅读干扰区域。使用了“大声朗读”任务(在多语患者中翻译成不同语言)。在左半球(44例患者)和右半球(10例患者)进行了脑图谱绘制。根据干扰类型、位置以及与命名区域的差异来确定参与阅读的皮质区域。刺激几个主要的半球区域会导致大声朗读受到显著干扰:(i)中央前回和中央后回下部(P < 0.00001);(ii)优势半球的缘上回、角回以及颞上回后部(P < 0.00001);(iii)优势半球的额下回和额中回(P < 0.001);以及(iv)优势半球颞中回后部(P < 0.05)。阅读干扰通常出现在小的皮质区域,其间区域不会引发阅读干扰。阅读和命名位点之间仅发现部分重叠。在刺激优势半球的顶下小叶或颞叶后部时,优先发现了特定于阅读的位点。注意到了不同类型的阅读干扰。双侧中央前回和中央后回出现“发音”干扰,双侧额中回出现眼球诱导运动,错语主要出现在优势半球的缘上回和颞上回后部。在许多区域发现了阅读停顿位点。阅读干扰位点偶尔也出现在非优势半球。在双语患者中,如果能找到共同的皮质区域,有时会检测到特定于语言和阅读的区域,这支持了双语者的语言技能在皮质上可能有相对不同表征的概念。最后,在本系列研究中,阅读干扰位点的位置及其相对特异性表现出相当大的个体差异。