Ravindran T K Sundari, Balasubramanian P
Reprod Health Matters. 2004 May;12(23):88-99. doi: 10.1016/s0968-8080(04)23133-0.
This study in rural Tamil Nadu, India, explored the reasons why many married women in India undergo induced abortions rather than use reversible contraception to space or limit births in terms of women's sexual and reproductive rights within marriage, and in the context of gender relations between couples more generally. It is based on in-depth interviews with two generations of ever-married women, some of whom had had abortions and others who had not, from 98 rural hamlets. The respondents were 66 women and 44 of their husbands. Non-consensual sex, sexual violence and women's inability to refuse their husband's sexual demands appeared to underlie the need for abortion in both younger and older women. Many men seemed to believe that sex within marriage was their right, and that women had no say in the matter. The findings raise questions about the presumed association between legal abortion and the enjoyment of reproductive and sexual rights. A large number of women who had abortions in this study were denied their sexual rights but were permitted, even forced, to terminate their pregnancies for reasons unrelated to their right to choose abortion. The study brings home the need for activism to promote women's sexual rights and a campaign against sexual violence in marriage.
这项在印度泰米尔纳德邦农村地区开展的研究,从婚姻中女性的性权利和生殖权利以及更广泛的夫妻间性别关系背景出发,探讨了为何印度许多已婚女性选择人工流产而非采用可逆避孕措施来间隔生育或限制生育数量。该研究基于对来自98个乡村聚居点的两代曾婚女性的深入访谈,其中一些女性有过流产经历,另一些则没有。受访者包括66名女性及其44名丈夫。非自愿性行为、性暴力以及女性无力拒绝丈夫的性要求似乎是年轻女性和年长女性都需要堕胎的根本原因。许多男性似乎认为婚内性行为是他们的权利,而女性在这件事上没有发言权。这些研究结果对合法堕胎与生殖及性权利享有之间的假定关联提出了质疑。在这项研究中,大量堕胎女性的性权利被剥夺,但却因与她们选择堕胎权利无关的原因被允许甚至被迫终止妊娠。该研究凸显了开展行动主义以促进女性性权利以及开展反对婚内性暴力运动的必要性。