Suppr超能文献

非职业活动对建筑工人总噪声暴露的影响。

Contributions of non-occupational activities to total noise exposure of construction workers.

作者信息

Neitzel Richard, Seixas Noah, Goldman Bryan, Daniell William

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Box 357234, Seattle 98195-7234, USA.

出版信息

Ann Occup Hyg. 2004 Jul;48(5):463-73. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meh041. Epub 2004 Jul 8.

Abstract

This paper describes how exposures received during routine and episodic non-occupational activities contribute to total noise exposure in a group of occupationally exposed workers. Two-hundred and sixty-six construction apprentices enrolled in a longitudinal hearing loss study and completed questionnaires at 1 yr of follow-up to determine their episodic activities (e.g. concert attendance, power tool use, firearms exposure). Noise exposure levels for these episodic exposures were determined from the published literature. Routine activities were assessed using activity cards filled out over 530 subject-days, along with noise dosimetry measurements made over 124 subject-days of measurement. Equivalent Leq exposure levels were then calculated for specific activities. These activity-specific Leq values were combined into estimated individual annual Leq exposure levels for the 6760 nominal annual non-occupational hours in a year (LAeq6760h), which were then transformed into equivalent levels for a 2000 h exposure period (LA2000hn) for comparison with occupational noise exposure risk criteria. The mean non-occupational LAeq6760h exposure values for the cohort ranged from 56 to 87 dBA (equivalent LA2000hn 62-93 dBA). At the mid range of the routine and episodic activity exposure level distribution, the mean LAeq6760h was 73 dBA (LA2000hn 78 dBA). Nineteen percent of the LA2000hn non-occupational exposures exceeded 85 dBA, the generally recommended occupational limit for a 2000 h workyear, at the mid-range of exposure levels. Due to a lack of available data, firearms use could not be incorporated into the total noise exposure estimates. However, firearms users reported more exposure to other noisy non-occupational activities and had statistically significantly higher estimated exposure levels even without including their firearms exposure than did non-shooters. When compared with the high levels of occupational noise found in construction, non-occupational noise exposures generally present little additional exposure for most workers. However, they may contribute significantly to overall exposure in the subset of workers who frequently participate in selected noisy activities.

摘要

本文描述了在日常和偶发性非职业活动中所接触到的噪声如何导致一组职业暴露工人的总噪声暴露增加。266名建筑学徒参与了一项纵向听力损失研究,并在随访1年时完成问卷调查,以确定他们的偶发性活动(如参加音乐会、使用电动工具、接触火器)。这些偶发性暴露的噪声暴露水平根据已发表的文献确定。日常活动通过在530个受试者日填写的活动卡片进行评估,并结合在124个受试者测量日进行的噪声剂量测量。然后计算特定活动的等效连续A声级(Leq)暴露水平。这些特定活动的Leq值被合并为一年中6760个名义年度非职业小时的估计个人年度Leq暴露水平(LAeq6760h),然后转换为2000小时暴露期的等效水平(LA2000hn),以便与职业噪声暴露风险标准进行比较。该队列的平均非职业LAeq6760h暴露值范围为56至87分贝A(等效LA2000hn为62至93分贝A)。在日常和偶发性活动暴露水平分布的中间范围,平均LAeq6760h为73分贝A(LA2000hn为78分贝A)。在暴露水平的中间范围,19%的LA2000hn非职业暴露超过了85分贝A,这是通常建议的2000小时工作年的职业限值。由于缺乏可用数据,火器使用无法纳入总噪声暴露估计中。然而,即使不包括火器暴露,火器使用者报告的其他嘈杂非职业活动暴露更多,且估计暴露水平在统计学上显著高于非射击者。与建筑行业中发现的高水平职业噪声相比,非职业噪声暴露通常对大多数工人几乎没有额外暴露增加,但它们可能对经常参与某些嘈杂活动的工人亚组的总体暴露有显著贡献。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验