Schäper Michael, Seeber Andreas, van Thriel Christoph
Institut für Arbeitsphysiologie, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2008;21(3):191-200. doi: 10.2478/v10001-008-0030-z.
The ototoxicity of occupational exposure to toluene plus noise was investigated in a longitudinal study in rotogravure printing and existing findings in the literature were evaluated.
The study comprised four repeated examinations during 5 years and started with 333 male workers. Lifetime weighted average exposures (LWAE) to toluene and noise were determined from individual work histories and historic recordings; recent individual exposures were measured 10 times during the study (toluene, active sampling; noise, stationary measurements). Auditory thresholds were measured with pure tone audiometry at 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 kHz.
Mean LWAE exposures to toluene and noise were 45+/-17 ppm plus 82+/-7 dB(A) for high toluene exposed and 10+/-7 ppm plus 82+/-4 dB(A) for low toluene exposed subjects, mean current exposures were 26+/-20 ppm plus 81+/-4 dB(A) and 3+/-3 ppm plus 82+/-4 dB(A). Mean exposure duration was 21.3+/-6.5 years for long exposed and 5.9+/-2.2 years for short exposed subjects. Repeated measurement analyses of variance did not reveal effects of toluene intensity, exposure duration and interactions between toluene intensity and noise intensity. Noise intensity [79+/-3 dB(A) vs. 84+/-1 dB(A)] was significant for auditory thresholds. A case concept utilising developments of individual auditory thresholds did not reveal significant toluene effects. Logistic models including age, exposure duration, toluene in ambient air, current noise and either hippuric acid or ortho-cresol (o-cresol) found only age to be significant for elevated OR of high frequency hearing loss.
Due to missing toluene effects, it was concluded that the threshold level for developing hearing loss as a result of occupational exposure to toluene plus noise might be above the current limit of 50 ppm toluene.
在一项轮转凹版印刷纵向研究中,调查职业性接触甲苯加噪声的耳毒性,并评估文献中的现有研究结果。
该研究在5年内进行了4次重复检查,起始对象为333名男性工人。根据个人工作经历和历史记录确定甲苯和噪声的终身加权平均暴露量(LWAE);在研究期间对近期个人暴露量进行了10次测量(甲苯采用主动采样;噪声采用固定测量)。使用纯音听力计在0.125、0.25、0.5、0.75、1、2、3、4、6、8、12kHz测量听觉阈值。
高甲苯暴露组的甲苯和噪声平均LWAE暴露量分别为45±17ppm加82±7dB(A),低甲苯暴露组为10±7ppm加82±4dB(A),当前平均暴露量分别为26±20ppm加81±4dB(A)和3±3ppm加82±4dB(A)。长期暴露组的平均暴露持续时间为21.3±6.5年,短期暴露组为5.9±2.2年。重复测量方差分析未显示甲苯强度、暴露持续时间以及甲苯强度与噪声强度之间相互作用的影响。噪声强度[79±3dB(A)与84±1dB(A)]对听觉阈值有显著影响。利用个体听觉阈值变化情况的病例概念未显示出显著的甲苯效应。包含年龄、暴露持续时间、环境空气中甲苯、当前噪声以及马尿酸或邻甲酚(o-甲酚)的逻辑模型仅发现年龄对高频听力损失升高的比值比有显著影响。
由于未发现甲苯的影响,得出结论:职业性接触甲苯加噪声导致听力损失的阈值水平可能高于当前50ppm甲苯的限值。